Skip to main content

Security report for passionfroot.me

Passionfroot · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Passionfroot is a technology platform focused on enabling tech brands to scale their influencer marketing efforts through a streamlined B2B creator marketing platform. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting tech companies and creators seeking efficient collaboration, booking, and payment solutions. The platform emphasizes ease of use, safety, and speed in managing influencer campaigns across multiple social media platforms. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with integrations of modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Amplitude, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and consent mechanisms in place, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or terms policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is safe, well-designed, and credible, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching passionfroot.me

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Passionfroot positions itself as a specialized platform in the influencer marketing technology sector, focusing on B2B relationships between tech brands and creators. Its business model revolves around providing a SaaS platform that facilitates discovery, collaboration, and payment for influencer campaigns. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing service providers to enhance platform capabilities. The target market includes tech companies looking to scale marketing efforts and creators seeking monetization opportunities. The presence of a pricing guide and customer stories suggests a growth-oriented approach with an emphasis on transparency and customer success. The platform's use of multiple tracking and consent tools reflects awareness of data privacy and marketing effectiveness. However, the absence of detailed business registration or physical address information limits full business intelligence assessment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiefirst. It uses reputable third-party analytics and tracking services, which are industry standard. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Forms are present but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation details are visible. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. To improve security maturity, the company should publish privacy and security policies, implement security headers, and provide incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including a security contact email or security.txt file.
  4. Expand contact information to include direct company emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Passionfroot
Description
Meet the fastest and easiest way to do B2B creator marketing at scale. Find the right creators on all platforms, book & collaborate, pay quickly & safely - all in one place.
Key services
Creator discovery across platforms, Booking and collaboration tools, Payment processing, Campaign management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow (CMS and hosting), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude Analytics, Customer.io Forms, Vimeo (video embedding), Typekit Fonts, Swiper.js (carousel), CSS3, HTML5, JavaScript
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Consent banner for cookies
  • Use of secure payment and collaboration platform

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude
Marketing tools
Customer.io Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Focus on B2B influencer marketing for tech brands
  3. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools
  4. Consent management implemented via Cookiefirst
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  6. Contact information limited to form submissions
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosting platform, leveraging modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude, and Customer.io for form handling. The site uses Typekit for font management and Vimeo for video embedding. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. The technical implementation is clean with no visible broken elements or errors. However, the site could benefit from additional security configurations and more comprehensive privacy and legal documentation to reduce technical debt and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with passionfroot.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review passionfroot.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.