Skip to main content

Security report for parse.ly

Parse.ly · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Parse.ly is a technology company specializing in content analytics solutions tailored for newsrooms and content marketers. Positioned as a key player integrated with WordPress VIP, Parse.ly offers a suite of services including a content analytics dashboard, content conversion engine, developer APIs, and data pipelines to empower data-driven content strategies. The company targets media and marketing professionals seeking actionable insights to optimize content performance and prove ROI. Technically, the website is built on WordPress VIP infrastructure, leveraging modern JavaScript, PHP, and integrations with HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and CookieYes for marketing and compliance. The site demonstrates excellent design, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly detailed. Overall, Parse.ly presents a trustworthy and professional online presence consistent with its business claims and parent company Automattic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parse.ly

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Parse.ly holds a solid market position as a specialized analytics platform within the media and marketing technology sector. Its integration with WordPress VIP and backing by Automattic enhances its credibility and reach. The business model is SaaS-based, focusing on subscription and enterprise clients who require real-time content analytics and data pipelines. The company leverages partnerships with WordPress VIP and uses advanced marketing tools like HubSpot and Google Tag Manager to drive growth. Customer testimonials and clear service offerings indicate a focus on user empowerment and data accessibility. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a funnel towards demos and enterprise sales. The ecosystem includes trusted partners and service providers, supporting a robust operational framework.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information represents a gap in transparency and readiness communication. The use of third-party scripts is managed with consent, but continuous monitoring is recommended. Overall, the security maturity is high, suitable for a technology company handling analytics data, but could be improved by publishing explicit security and vulnerability disclosure policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add visible company contact information for security and general inquiries to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parse.ly
Description
Parse.ly makes working with data easy for newsrooms and marketers, giving them the insights they need to focus their content strategy and prove ROI.
Key services
Content Analytics Dashboard, Content Conversion Engine, Content API for Developers, Data Pipeline for Analysts, Content Management System integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
WordPress VIP, Rank Math SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot, Parse.ly Analytics, Segment
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Casale Media, BidSwitch
Tracking pixels
HubSpot, CookieYes
Marketing tools
HubSpot, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and granular controls.
  3. Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools with transparent disclosures.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact likely via other pages.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the main site.
  7. Branding and content are consistent and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress VIP platform, utilizing PHP and JavaScript with integrations for SEO (Rank Math), analytics (Google Analytics, HubSpot, Parse.ly), and cookie consent (CookieYes). The site demonstrates valid HTML and CSS, fast loading times, and excellent mobile responsiveness. Structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags are properly implemented for SEO and social sharing. Hosting is likely managed by WordPress VIP under Automattic, ensuring high availability and performance. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with opportunities to enhance security transparency and incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low28 findingsView report
  2. 78/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parse.ly. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parse.ly.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.