Skip to main content

Security report for parity.io

Parity Technologies · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Parity Technologies is a globally recognized technology company specializing in blockchain infrastructure and Web3 development. They are the primary technical force behind the Polkadot network, launched in 2020 in collaboration with the Web3 Foundation. The company targets developers and enterprises seeking scalable, decentralized blockchain solutions and offers developer tools, SDKs, and enterprise onboarding services. Their market position is strong within the blockchain ecosystem, supported by a professional website and active community engagement. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Google Cloud Platform, and uses a headless CMS (Strapi) for content management. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms, and a bug bounty program indicates a proactive security stance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy page are absent, and no direct security contact emails are published. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified for this business type. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations to enhance security headers, publish security policies, and provide clearer incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parity.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
93
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Parity Technologies operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on Web3 infrastructure and developer tools. Their competitive advantage lies in their leadership role in the Polkadot network and strong technical expertise. The business model includes software development, enterprise consulting, and ecosystem support. Revenue streams likely derive from enterprise partnerships, developer services, and possibly grants or foundation funding. Target customers include blockchain developers, startups, and enterprises transitioning to decentralized technologies. Growth indicators include active content updates, participation in industry events, and a global remote workforce. The partnership ecosystem includes the Web3 Foundation and Polkadot community. Strategic observations highlight a focus on long-term infrastructure stability and enterprise adoption rather than short-term hype.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place. The presence of a bug bounty program indicates commitment to vulnerability management. However, the absence of explicit security headers (such as CSP, HSTS) and a dedicated security policy or incident response page limits transparency. No direct security contact emails were found, which could hinder incident reporting. There is no evidence of compliance gaps related to GDPR or NIS2, and privacy policies are comprehensive. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced communication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact information for security issues.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Provide direct security contact emails (e.g., security@parity.io) to improve incident reporting and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parity Technologies
Description
Parity Technologies is a global collective of pioneering, passionate software engineers. They work with the Web3 Foundation and completed the launch of Polkadot in 2020. They focus on building blockchain infrastructure and Web3 technologies for enterprises and developers.
Key services
Blockchain network development (Polkadot), Developer tools and SDKs, Enterprise Web3 infrastructure solutions, Consulting and business development for Web3 adoption
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Cloud Storage, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Bug bounty program available

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No exposed sensitive data or security warnings detected.
  3. Strong focus on Web3 and blockchain technology.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented properly.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via form only.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed response, likely privacy-protected.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  9. Social media presence on Twitter (X), LinkedIn, Telegram, GitHub.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, supported by a headless CMS (Strapi) and hosted on Google Cloud Platform. The site demonstrates fast loading times, mobile responsiveness, and good accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of cloud storage for media assets ensures scalability. No legacy or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided scripts. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for a technology company operating in the blockchain space.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parity.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parity.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.