Skip to main content

Security report for pandra.app

Pandra · Technology · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pandra is a French technology company operating a SaaS platform that requires user authentication via a login page. The website is built using modern web technologies including Angular, CKEditor, Chart.js, and integrates Google Analytics and Stripe for analytics and payment functionalities. The platform targets a general audience and appears to be a small-sized business with a focus on providing digital services. The website content is primarily in French and includes a link to legal information hosted on a subdomain. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks visible security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies on the login page. No contact information or incident response details are provided, which limits transparency. The domain registration is privacy protected, which is common for tech startups, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website is functional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pandra.app

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pandra positions itself as a technology service provider with a subscription or account-based business model. The lack of visible marketing or partner domains suggests a focused, possibly early-stage operation. The integration of Stripe indicates monetization through payments. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager shows an intent to monitor user behavior for business insights. The absence of contact details and limited public business information may impact trust and customer acquisition. The company targets French-speaking users and operates in the technology sector, likely providing software or platform services. Growth potential could be enhanced by improving transparency and expanding visible business information.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The login form uses secure input types and autocomplete attributes, but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms are visible from the HTML. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response policies are published, which may hinder timely security issue management. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Stripe is standard but requires careful privacy management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and security policies directly accessible from the login page.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and incident response channels to improve transparency and user confidence.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve website discoverability and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pandra
Description
Pandra appears to be a technology company providing a platform requiring user login, likely SaaS or app-based service.
Key services
user account management, online platform access
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 14.2.2, CKEditor 4.11.1, Chart.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Stripe Pricing Table
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form inputs with autocomplete attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a French language login page for Pandra platform.
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policy on login page; privacy policy linked externally.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  4. Uses modern frontend framework Angular and common JS libraries.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Stripe integration scripts.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content; HTTPS enforced.
  7. No visible security or incident response policies.
  8. No advertising or affiliate programs detected on login page.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. WHOIS data is privacy protected; no registrant details available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Angular 14.2.2 as its frontend framework, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It incorporates CKEditor for rich text editing and Chart.js for data visualization, suggesting interactive features beyond the login page. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking, and Stripe integration indicates payment processing capabilities. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and scripts from reputable CDNs, supporting performance and reliability. The HTML is well-structured but lacks meta tags for SEO and accessibility enhancements. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom-built platform. Technical debt appears low but improvements in SEO, accessibility, and security headers are recommended to reduce risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pandra.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pandra.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.