Skip to main content

Security report for panasonic.com

Panasonic · Technology · Finland

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Panasonic's Finnish website presents a comprehensive digital presence for both consumer and business audiences, showcasing a wide range of products and solutions. The site is built on a robust technical infrastructure leveraging Adobe Experience Manager CMS, enhanced with modern JavaScript libraries and integrated marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for cookie consent. The website demonstrates a strong brand identity with consistent logos and professional design tailored for the Finnish market. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is notable but likely due to privacy or registry policies, not detracting from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site reflects an enterprise-level digital asset with good compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching panasonic.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention panasonic.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
28,282
Employees
217
Customers
25,917
Third parties
2,148
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-06-16 · 337 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for panasonic.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.eds.panasonic.com2026-06-16
  • –owa.eds.panasonic.com2026-06-16
  • –club.panasonic.com2026-06-16
  • –sts.eds.panasonic.com2026-06-16
  • –owa.eds.panasonic.com2026-06-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Panasonic operates as a global technology leader with a localized European and Finnish presence, targeting both consumers and business sectors. The website supports their business model of manufacturing and selling consumer electronics and business solutions, providing product information, support, and corporate news. The integration of partner and service domains such as support and customer portals indicates a mature ecosystem. The site’s content and navigation cater well to the Finnish audience, supporting brand loyalty and market penetration. The lack of explicit contact details on the main site suggests reliance on dedicated support portals. Panasonic's market position is strong, supported by a consistent brand and comprehensive product offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism, reflecting awareness of privacy and security regulations. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not detected in the provided content, representing an area for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK introduces typical tracking vectors but is managed via consent. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly visible, which is common but could be improved for transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional header hardening and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation to enhance transparency and compliance.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet international standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Panasonic
Description
Panasonic Suomen tarjoamat monipuoliset tuotteet ja ratkaisut sekä tuotemerkkiin liittyvät tarinat
Key services
Consumer electronics, Business solutions, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Akamai, Adobe CQ/AEM (Adobe Experience Manager)
Frameworks
Adobe CQ/AEM
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Finnish language
  2. Uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS and modern JavaScript libraries
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent via OneTrust
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content
  6. Strong brand presence with official logos and consistent branding
  7. No signs of WAF or security blocking mechanisms
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or registry policies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, combined with jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries for enhanced interactivity. Google Tag Manager and OneTrust are used for analytics and privacy compliance, respectively. The site is hosted behind Akamai CDN, ensuring good performance and availability. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive images and layouts detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern and enterprise-grade, supporting Panasonic's business needs effectively. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the complexity of the CMS and third-party integrations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with panasonic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review panasonic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.