Skip to main content

Security report for own.security

Own · Technology · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Own is a French cybersecurity company specializing in tailor-made cybersecurity services including outsourced CISO, security assessments, threat analysis, SOC management, incident response, audits, consulting, and CERT operations. The company positions itself as a pure player in cybersecurity, offering personalized and informed support to organizations. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight tags, hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast performance and good accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are missing. The domain registration data is consistent with the company's claims, indicating legitimacy. Overall, Own demonstrates a strong market position in cybersecurity services with a professional online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching own.security

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention own.security, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for own.security right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Own operates in the technology sector, focusing on cybersecurity services tailored to organizational needs. Their business model revolves around providing expert consulting, managed security services, and incident response. The company targets medium-sized organizations requiring advanced cybersecurity governance and operational support. Their certifications, such as PASSI-RGS, and presence on professional social media platforms enhance their credibility. The partnership with platforms like Welcome to the Jungle indicates active recruitment and growth. The company maintains a moderate size with over 70 experts, emphasizing multidisciplinary teams. Their market positioning as a specialized cybersecurity pure player suggests a competitive advantage in delivering customized solutions.

Security posture

The website and company demonstrate a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. The presence of a SOC managed service and incident response offerings indicates operational readiness for security incidents. However, the absence of explicit security headers and published security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests areas for improvement. GDPR compliance is implied through services like outsourced DPO but lacks explicit documentation on the site. Incident response contact channels are not explicitly provided via email, which could hinder rapid communication. Overall, the security culture appears strong internally but could benefit from enhanced transparency and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and disclose a cookie consent mechanism to enhance user privacy compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve site security.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact emails (e.g., security@ or abuse@) to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to build trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Own
Description
OWN offers personalized cybersecurity services to protect your business from online threats. Advice, audit and threat intelligence for optimal protection.
Key services
Outsourced CISO, Security assessment, Threat analysis, SOC Managed, Incident response, Audit, Consulting, CERT
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Finsweet ScrollDisable, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical and external scripts)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cybersecurity service offerings
  2. Strong professional branding and consistent messaging
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies
  5. No visible security headers in provided data
  6. No public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt
  7. Contact information present but no direct emails found in HTML
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, GitHub
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight. The hosting on Webflow's CDN ensures fast loading times and good global availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. The technical implementation is robust, though adding security headers and privacy compliance tools would enhance the overall technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with own.security. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review own.security.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.