Skip to main content

Security report for overalia.com

Overalia · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Overalia is a specialized digital marketing agency based in Spain, with a strong focus on online marketing strategies, web development, traffic acquisition, and analytics. The company positions itself as a Google Analytics Certified Partner and Google Partner, serving a diverse client base with over 1,200 projects completed. Their website demonstrates a professional and modern digital presence, utilizing contemporary web technologies and providing comprehensive content including case studies and detailed service descriptions. The technical infrastructure is solid, with HTTPS enforced and integration of security features like Google reCAPTCHA. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented, reflecting good compliance with GDPR standards. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, although the website content and certifications strongly support the business's credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching overalia.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and digital marketing sector, targeting businesses and institutions seeking to improve their online presence and marketing effectiveness. Overalia's business model revolves around providing tailored consulting and implementation services in SEO, SEM, inbound marketing, web development, and analytics. Their market position is strengthened by Google certifications and a portfolio of successful client case studies demonstrating measurable ROI improvements. The agency emphasizes a methodology-driven approach to ensure results, appealing to clients who value data-driven marketing strategies. The presence of a press room subdomain and active social media channels indicates a mature marketing and communication strategy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy policies further enhance compliance and user trust. However, the lack of detected security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or security policy information is found, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data is a concern from a domain trust perspective but does not directly impact the website's technical security. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional best practices and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider verifying and publishing domain registration details to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Overalia
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Overalia
Description
Overalia es una agencia de marketing digital partner de Google Analytics enfocada a proyectos de marketing online globales o personalizados.
Key services
Estrategia Online, Desarrollo Web, Adquisición de Tráfico, Seguimiento de Resultados
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google reCAPTCHA, Typekit Fonts, Modernizr, TweenMax, Metricool Tracker
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Metricool
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Metricool
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong presence of Google partnership and certifications.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which reduces domain trust score.
  6. Multiple case studies with measurable results enhance credibility.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Contact information includes physical address and social media links but no explicit emails or phone numbers found in content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Font Awesome for icons, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit, and analytics are tracked using Google Analytics and Metricool. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred resources. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. The site includes comprehensive meta tags and SEO-friendly content structure. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking, representing a potential risk area.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with overalia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review overalia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.