Skip to main content

Security report for otrum.com

Uniguest · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uniguest is a technology company specializing in cloud-managed screen software solutions including Interactive TV, Digital Signage, and Casting, primarily targeting hospitality and healthcare sectors. Their Otrum platform is designed to deliver personalized guest experiences and is distributed globally through a channel partner network. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and comprehensive content about their services and deployment options. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern performance and multilingual plugins, hosted on Azure DNS infrastructure, and optimized for mobile and SEO. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent banners. Business credibility is high with consistent branding, clear company information, and active social media channels. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant, supporting Uniguest's position as a reputable technology provider in their market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching otrum.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Uniguest operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital signage and IPTV solutions for hospitality and healthcare industries. Their business model leverages a global channel partner network for sales and deployment, emphasizing flexible cloud and hybrid deployment options. The company has a long-established domain since 2001, indicating stability and market presence. Their product suite includes interactive TV, digital signage, and casting solutions, supported by managed hardware and content creation services. The website's integration with multiple partner portals and platforms suggests a broad ecosystem. Marketing efforts include multilingual content and active social media engagement. The company appears to prioritize customer experience and scalability, positioning itself competitively in the digital signage and IPTV market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and valid SSL certificates. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate attention to data protection compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options represent areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable plugins and performance optimizations, reducing risk from outdated components. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a commercial website but could benefit from additional hardening and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  3. Add missing security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and X-Frame-Options for improved protection.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Uniguest
Description
Otrum is a cloud platform for the delivery of digital signage, interactive TV and casting designed for hotels and hospitals. Uniguest provides digital signage software, IP video, IPTV and engagement apps.
Key services
Interactive TV, Digital Signage, Casting, Cloud Deployment, Hybrid Deployment, On-Premise Deployment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Divi Theme, jQuery 3.7.1, WP Rocket, TranslatePress Multilingual, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WP Rocket and compliance plugins)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Multiple language support via TranslatePress plugin.
  4. Use of modern performance optimization plugin WP Rocket.
  5. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter (X), and YouTube.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or credentials found in HTML.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy page found.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is long-established and registered with GoDaddy.
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  10. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Divi theme and several plugins including WP Rocket for performance optimization and TranslatePress for multilingual support. It leverages jQuery 3.7.1 and FontAwesome for UI elements. Hosting is supported by Azure DNS infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for performance with lazy loading, preloading, and caching mechanisms. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional and scalable web presence. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS configuration to further reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with otrum.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review otrum.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.