Skip to main content

Security report for ormix.lv

Ormix Electronics · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ormix Electronics is a Latvian-based retailer and wholesaler specializing in electronic components, including discrete semiconductors, passive components, integrated circuits, connectors, optical components, LED lighting, and related tools and accessories. The website targets electronics professionals and hobbyists, offering a broad catalog with multi-language support in Latvian, Russian, and English. The company appears to be a small-sized business focused on the local market with a consistent brand presence and clear contact information. Technically, the website uses legacy jQuery and Modernizr libraries, integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for tracking, and is moderately optimized for mobile and performance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and privacy/cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ormix.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ormix Electronics operates in the technology retail sector, focusing on electronic components distribution in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive product catalog and multi-language accessibility, catering to a diverse customer base including hobbyists and businesses. The business model combines retail and wholesale sales, with a clear emphasis on quality and variety. The presence of detailed product categories and special offers suggests active inventory management and customer engagement. The company maintains direct contact channels but lacks visible certifications or security policies, which could be improved to enhance trust. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance concern under GDPR. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.10.2 may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. Tracking scripts from Google and Facebook indicate moderate user tracking without clear user consent mechanisms. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, limiting transparency. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, update libraries, and establish privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries to current stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ormix Electronics
Description
Radiodetaļas veikals Ormix Electronics piedāvā: radiodetaļas, radiodetaļu tirdzniecība, elektroniskās komponentes, sīkrīkus, mikroshēmas. Labas cenas un plaša izvēle!
Key services
Sale of discrete semiconductors, Passive components, Integrated circuits, Connectors, Optical components, LED lighting, Tools and accessories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Modernizr 2.6.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (base href is https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian electronics components retailer with a comprehensive product catalog.
  2. Multi-language support for Latvian, Russian, and English.
  3. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly provided.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. Uses common analytics and marketing tracking scripts.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery 1.10.2 and Modernizr 2.6.2, indicating legacy codebase elements. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is structured with a comprehensive product catalog and multi-language support, indicating moderate technical complexity. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. Accessibility and SEO are basic, with potential for improvement. The lack of modern frameworks or progressive web app features suggests opportunities for modernization to improve scalability and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ormix.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ormix.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.