Skip to main content

Security report for orionstar.com

OrionStar Robotics · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OrionStar Robotics is a globally positioned AI service robot solutions provider specializing in a variety of robotic products including delivery robots, greeting robots, warehouse robots, and collaborative robotic arms. The company targets business sectors such as hospitality, retail, warehouse logistics, and factory automation, offering tailored and integrated robotic solutions to enhance operational efficiency and customer experience. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with multilingual support and extensive product information. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a data-driven approach to customer engagement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and client-side validation but lacks explicit security headers and comprehensive privacy documentation. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, though improvements in security best practices and privacy transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orionstar.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a leading AI robotics solutions provider with a diversified product portfolio and a clear B2B business model. Their competitive advantage lies in advanced AI capabilities, customization options, and integration services. The presence of partner domains like UFactory indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on enterprise clients in technology-driven sectors. Marketing and analytics tools are extensively used to track user behavior and optimize conversions. The company appears to be large-scale with a global reach, though specific founding year and corporate structure details are not disclosed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and client-side form validation is implemented. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, which may impact compliance with regulations like GDPR or NIS2. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. Data collection via forms is comprehensive but lacks visible privacy policy linkage, which could raise compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages clearly linked from the website footer or header.
  3. Establish and disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention and user privacy information to improve compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OrionStar Robotics
Description
OrionStar Robotics is a world-leading AI service robot solutions company, offering cutting-edge robot waiters, warehouse robots, robot promoters, and hospitality robots. Our robots excel in meal delivery, warehouse automation, promotional activities, and smart reception, featuring voice explanations and seating guidance. We also support customization for diverse functional needs, ensuring seamless integration and tailored solutions.
Key services
robot waiters, warehouse robots, robot promoters, hospitality robots, customized robot solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Tippy.js, Layer.js, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Form validation on client side
  • Consent banner for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional corporate site for OrionStar Robotics
  2. Content is rich with product details, solutions, and case studies
  3. Multiple languages supported via subdomains
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts
  5. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in main HTML
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including email and phone
  7. Forms collect detailed user data with validation and tracking
  8. No WHOIS data available for subdomain, typical for subdomains
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content
  10. Cookie consent banner present and active
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Swiper.js for UI components. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. The site integrates multiple marketing and tracking tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Technical debt appears low but security-related technical improvements are needed to enhance resilience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orionstar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orionstar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.