Skip to main content

Security report for orion-alliance.com

Orion Alliance · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orion Alliance is a European-based software development company established in 2007, providing a broad spectrum of IT services including application support, cloud computing, DevOps, data analytics, and enterprise application development. With over 100 industry experts and multiple development centers in the Netherlands, Latvia, and Poland, the company targets ambitious businesses seeking to leverage technology for growth and operational efficiency. Their business model focuses on both onsite and offshore delivery, emphasizing 24/7 customer support and personalized solutions. Technically, the website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging Google Fonts and Google Analytics for performance and tracking. Hosting and DNS services are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring good SSL configuration and moderate performance. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and basic accessibility features. Cookie consent is implemented with an opt-in mechanism, reflecting GDPR compliance awareness. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers or published security policies were found. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional best practices. The overall risk assessment is low, with no signs of malicious activity or suspicious domain registration patterns. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing security headers to strengthen defenses. These steps will improve compliance, trust, and resilience against cyber threats.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orion-alliance.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Orion Alliance occupies a competitive position in the European software development market, leveraging a medium-sized team of over 100 experts and multiple geographic locations to serve diverse industries such as finance, healthcare, energy, and manufacturing. Their B2B business model focuses on delivering tailored software solutions and IT project management services, supported by 24/7 customer service. The company’s growth is supported by a broad service portfolio including cloud computing, DevOps, legacy migration, and QA testing, enabling them to address complex client needs. The absence of parent or subsidiary companies suggests an independent operation. Their digital presence is professional and consistent, supporting brand trust and client acquisition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections active. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness for security events. Data collection via Google Analytics is managed with user consent, aligning with privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a software services company but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls to mitigate risks and comply with evolving standards like GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy including incident response procedures.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to the web server configuration.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orion Alliance
Description
Orion Alliance team provides a full spectrum of software services in accordance with your wishes and strategies. We provide complex analysis and management of IT projects with 24/7 availability.
Key services
Application Support & Maintenance, AWS Cost Optimization, Cloud Computing & Development, Data Analytics, DevOps, Enterprise Application Development, Enterprise Application Integration, Infrastructure Support, IT Outstaffing, Legacy Migration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS, cookieconsent.js
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern React/Next.js framework with server-side rendering.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in mechanism, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and includes multiple European office addresses and phone numbers.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published on site.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking with consent.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, providing server-side rendering and good SEO capabilities. Hosting is managed through Cloudflare, offering CDN and DNS services. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts and fonts to optimize load times. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts for typography. Cookie consent is implemented with an opt-in model, reflecting privacy compliance. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. The technical stack is current and supports scalability, though improvements in security headers and DNS configuration are recommended to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orion-alliance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orion-alliance.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.