Skip to main content

Security report for origintrail.io

OriginTrail · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OriginTrail is a technology company specializing in decentralized knowledge graph infrastructure that powers trustworthy and verifiable AI with human involvement. The company positions itself as a leader in human-centric AI, offering solutions across multiple sectors including supply chains, healthcare, transportation, construction, decentralized science, and industry 4.0. Their business model revolves around providing a decentralized ecosystem supported by TRAC token staking and a network of nodes, enabling secure and transparent data exchange. The company has established strong partnerships with major industry players such as Google, Microsoft, Walmart, and Nvidia, enhancing its market credibility. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like React and Next.js, hosted with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The site employs best practices in SEO, accessibility, and user experience, with comprehensive metadata and structured content. Analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager are used for user behavior tracking, with a moderate level of user tracking and good privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS with strong domain registration protections including multiple EPP status flags. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. The company lacks a publicly stated security policy or incident response contacts, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and trust. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, technical maturity, and business credibility. The risk profile is low with no critical security issues identified. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing explicit security and incident response policies, and adding a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen security posture and stakeholder trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching origintrail.io

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OriginTrail operates in the decentralized technology and AI sector, targeting enterprises and developers seeking trustworthy AI solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its Decentralized Knowledge Graph technology that combines symbolic and neural AI for verifiable data integrity. The business model includes ecosystem partnerships, token staking, and providing node infrastructure. Revenue streams likely include enterprise solutions, token economics, and ecosystem services. The company shows strong growth indicators through partnerships with industry leaders and a broad solution portfolio. The partnership ecosystem is diverse, spanning technology giants, blockchain projects, and industry-specific organizations. Operationally, OriginTrail maintains a consistent brand and professional digital presence, supporting its market position as an innovative technology provider.

Security posture

OriginTrail's security maturity is good, with enforced HTTPS, domain registration protections, and secure hosting infrastructure. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. The company demonstrates a security-conscious culture through delegated staking and network decentralization. Compliance gaps include lack of explicit security framework references and incident response details. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity and trust but could be enhanced with formalized policies and disclosure programs.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing direct security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party libraries and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OriginTrail
Description
OriginTrail organizes knowledge in a Decentralized Knowledge Graph to enable trustworthy, verifiable AI with humans in the loop. It offers solutions across multiple sectors including supply chains, healthcare, transportation, construction, decentralized science, and industry 4.0.
Key services
Decentralized Knowledge Graph (DKG), AI solutions with verifiable data, Edge and Core Nodes, Delegated Staking, ChatDKG agent framework
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS, JavaScript, CSS Modules
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple EPP status flags
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of delegated staking for network security

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (implied)
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging around decentralized AI and knowledge graph technology
  3. Multiple industry use cases and partner logos enhance trust
  4. Comprehensive footer with privacy, terms, and contact links
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected
  7. Active community and social media presence
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring a performant and responsive user experience. Hosting via Cloudflare provides CDN and DNS resilience. The site uses CSS modules for styling and includes optimized images and video content. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, balancing user insights with privacy compliance. The technical infrastructure is robust with no signs of technical debt or outdated components. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Opportunities exist to further enhance security via DNSSEC and to formalize security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with origintrail.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review origintrail.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.