Skip to main content

Security report for orbis.fi

Orbis Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orbis Oy is a Finnish company specializing in advanced data transfer solutions for various sectors including smart cities, real estate, data centers, manufacturing, defense, and telecommunications. With over 75 years of experience, Orbis positions itself as a reliable partner for developing future-proof data transfer infrastructure. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting industrial and governmental clients with tailored solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO and analytics, and it employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting high legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orbis.fi

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention orbis.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for orbis.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Orbis operates in a niche technology sector focusing on data transfer infrastructure for critical industries. Their business model is B2B, providing customized cabling and network solutions. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers like Salesforce and uses Google Analytics for insights. The website content and structure indicate a mature organization with a clear market position in Finland and possibly broader Nordic markets. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication approach, likely via dedicated contact pages. The company benefits from a long-established domain and consistent branding, which supports customer trust and market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid for a corporate website but could be strengthened with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  4. Consider adding explicit contact emails and phone numbers for customer support and security reporting.
  5. Maintain and update cookie and privacy policies regularly to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Orbis Oy
Registration number
0112274-7
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orbis Oy
Description
Orbis develops future data transfer solutions for smart cities, real estate, data centers, manufacturing, and defense industries. They provide advanced data transfer solutions with over 75 years of experience.
Key services
Data transfer solutions, Cabling and infrastructure for data centers, Solutions for manufacturing and defense industries, Operator network solutions, Real estate data transfer
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO plugin, Cookie Information consent management
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Youtube
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Salesforce Pardot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories and descriptions.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page URL found but detailed privacy and cookie information is embedded in cookie consent overlay.
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  5. Contact information is present via contact page and WHOIS registrant address, but no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with SEO and analytics plugins.
  7. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent but could improve with additional security headers.
  8. Business information is consistent and credible with long domain age and matching registrant data.
  9. External links mostly to trusted partners and service providers.
  10. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.7.2, using jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The Yoast SEO plugin is employed for search engine optimization, and Cookie Information manages cookie consent with a detailed overlay. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Softavenue Oy, a Finnish provider. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of scripts and assets. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orbis.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orbis.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.