Skip to main content

Security report for optibase.io

Optibase · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Optibase is a specialized SaaS company offering an A/B testing and split testing solution tailored for Webflow users. The company positions itself as a key player filling the gap left by deprecated Google Optimize services, targeting marketers, agencies, and businesses seeking to optimize their Webflow sites. The website is professionally designed with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and multiple analytics and marketing tools, hosted on Cloudflare. However, a critical security weakness is the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the security posture. Privacy policies and terms of service are present and GDPR compliance is claimed, though no cookie consent mechanism was detected. Overall, the domain registration is privacy-protected but consistent with a legitimate startup founded in 2023. The site is accessible without WAF blocking, enabling full content analysis.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of optibase.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching optibase.io

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Optibase operates in the technology sector with a focus on conversion optimization tools for Webflow websites. Its business model is SaaS with free trials and demo scheduling, appealing to small to medium-sized businesses and agencies. The company has established trust through customer testimonials, a perfect G2 rating, and integration with recognized marketing and analytics platforms. The domain is relatively new but appropriate for the company's founding date. The use of privacy protection for domain registration is justified given the business type. The company maintains partnerships with scheduling platforms like Calendly and marketing service providers. The website content and structure support a strong market position in the niche of Webflow-specific A/B testing solutions.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate to poor due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are critical for secure communications. While some security headers like HSTS are present, they are not fully enabled. The site uses HttpOnly and Secure flags on cookies and has SPF and DMARC DNS records configured, indicating some email security measures. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE were detected. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption reduces SSL performance and security. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. Incident response and security policy documents are not found, suggesting room for improvement in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and configure OCSP stapling and session resumption for improved security and performance.
  3. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included and maintain security hygiene.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted via Cloudflare, leveraging a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Zoho Pagesense, and Snitcher for analytics and marketing. The site uses asynchronous script loading and preconnect hints for Google Fonts, indicating performance optimization efforts. The HTML is valid and well-structured with comprehensive meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Mobile optimization is good with responsive images and layouts. However, performance metrics are not provided, so load speed assessment is limited. Accessibility is basic but present. The lack of SSL and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical risks that could impact user trust and SEO rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +1Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 72/100 −1Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with optibase.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review optibase.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.