Skip to main content

Security report for openssl-library.org

OpenSSL · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OpenSSL Library is a professionally maintained, open source cryptographic software project providing a comprehensive toolkit for secure communication and cryptography. Supported by the OpenSSL Foundation and Corporation, it holds a leading position in the technology sector for cryptographic libraries. The website serves developers and security professionals with documentation, community resources, and software downloads. Technically, the site is built using the Hugo static site generator, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. The domain is newly registered in 2024 but aligns with the project's timeline and is managed through a reputable registrar with appropriate domain security measures. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a clear vulnerability reporting process, though improvements are recommended in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Privacy compliance is moderate with a privacy policy present but no cookie banner detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-positioned to serve its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching openssl-library.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention openssl-library.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for openssl-library.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The OpenSSL Library operates as an essential technology entity focused on cryptographic software development. Its business model is open source with funding and sponsorship from corporate and foundation partners. The project targets developers and organizations requiring secure communication tools. Market positioning is strong due to widespread adoption and community engagement. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships and donations. The partnership ecosystem includes the OpenSSL Foundation, Corporation, and community platforms, enhancing credibility and support. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active community resources. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining security best practices and expanding compliance measures to sustain trust and adoption.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a clientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers. The presence of a security bug reporting page and known vulnerabilities list indicates proactive vulnerability management. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and a security.txt file are gaps that could be addressed to enhance security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response contact channels are implied but not explicitly published, which could hinder rapid communication during security events. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved with additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish explicit security incident response contact emails (e.g., security@ or abuse@) and consider adding a security.txt file.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by including verified company emails and phone numbers on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OpenSSL
Description
The OpenSSL software library is a robust, commercial-grade, full-featured toolkit for general-purpose cryptography and secure communication. It is developed under the OpenSSL Mission with support from the OpenSSL Foundation and OpenSSL Corporation.
Key services
Cryptographic toolkit, Secure communication library, Community support, Documentation and guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, FontAwesome icons, Google Domains DNS, JavaScript
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Security bug reporting process
  • Known vulnerabilities list

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
transpond.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional resource for the OpenSSL cryptographic library.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy banner detected, which is a minor compliance gap.
  4. No explicit phone numbers or emails found on main pages; contact via contact page likely.
  5. No security.txt file found for vulnerability disclosure.
  6. Use of modern static site generator Hugo indicates good technical maturity.
  7. Tracking pixel from transpond.io detected, indicating some user tracking.
  8. No major security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  9. Domain WHOIS data consistent with project and no suspicious indicators.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator, which provides a fast and modern platform for content delivery. The use of FontAwesome icons and minimal JavaScript indicates a lightweight front-end. Hosting is managed via Google Domains DNS with multiple Google nameservers, ensuring reliable DNS resolution. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the lack of detected security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests some technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with openssl-library.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review openssl-library.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.