Skip to main content

Security report for openssl-foundation.org

OpenSSL Software Foundation · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The OpenSSL Foundation is a recently established non-profit organization dedicated to supporting the OpenSSL ecosystem. It collaborates closely with the OpenSSL Corporation to provide essential services such as fundraising, application development support, security response handling, and community engagement. The foundation targets open source communities, individual developers, academic institutions, and sponsors, positioning itself as a key enabler for the OpenSSL projects. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and sponsorship transparency. Technically, the website is built using the Hugo static site generator, hosted on Google Domains with modern front-end libraries like jQuery and Dropotron for UI enhancements. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices but lacks some accessibility features. Performance is moderate, and the site uses HTTPS with domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but does not publish a privacy policy, cookie policy, or vulnerability disclosure. No security headers were detected, and no incident response contacts are provided. Tracking is minimal, limited to a single third-party tracker. The WHOIS data is consistent with the foundation's claims, showing a recent registration date appropriate for the organization's founding year. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but has gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic improvements in policy publication, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure would enhance its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching openssl-foundation.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention openssl-foundation.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for openssl-foundation.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The OpenSSL Foundation operates as a small non-profit entity within the technology sector, specifically focusing on cryptographic software projects. Its business model relies on donations, sponsorships, and community support to fund its activities. The foundation's market position is strong within the open source security community due to its close ties with the OpenSSL Corporation and its role in supporting critical infrastructure projects. Key revenue streams include corporate sponsorships and individual donations. The foundation's partnership ecosystem includes notable sponsors such as Bloomberg and FLOSS Fund, enhancing its credibility and funding stability. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active community engagement initiatives. The foundation maintains a transparent donor and sponsor list, reinforcing trust and operational legitimacy.

Security posture

The foundation's security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protections are in place, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies (privacy, cookie, vulnerability disclosure) indicates room for improvement. The lack of incident response contact channels and security.txt reduces readiness for coordinated vulnerability handling. Minimal tracking reduces privacy risks but also limits analytics insights. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations exist due to missing policies. Overall, the security culture appears nascent but with foundational protections in place.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Add incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OpenSSL Software Foundation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OpenSSL Software Foundation
Description
The Foundation is a non-profit corporation that supports the OpenSSL Mission by working closely with the OpenSSL Corporation to provide services to OpenSSL projects. It focuses on non-commercial communities, fundraising, application development, security response, contributor license agreements, and community engagement.
Key services
Fundraising, Application development support, Security response handling, Contributor license agreement processing, Community engagement coordination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, jQuery, Dropotron, Pagefind search
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
transpond.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed non-profit foundation site supporting OpenSSL projects.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email and physical address.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  5. No phone numbers or social media links detected.
  6. Use of modern static site generator Hugo and Google Domains hosting.
  7. Minimal tracking detected (transpond.io tracker).
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  9. Domain WHOIS data consistent with website claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Hugo static site generator, which provides a lightweight and performant platform. Front-end technologies include jQuery and Dropotron for UI interactions and Pagefind for search functionality. Hosting is managed via Google Domains with Google Cloud DNS nameservers. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. The absence of a CMS reduces complexity but also limits dynamic content management. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with openssl-foundation.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review openssl-foundation.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.