Skip to main content

Security report for opengi.co.uk

Open GI · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Open GI is a well-established specialist technology partner providing innovative insurance software solutions primarily for brokers, MGAs, and insurers in the UK and Ireland. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including policy administration systems, product management, digital self-serve solutions, and support services. With over 45 years of market presence and a customer base exceeding 600, Open GI holds a strong position in the insurance technology sector. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging Webflow CMS and integrating advanced tracking and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. Security practices are generally sound with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism, although explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosures are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure aligned with business goals and compliance requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opengi.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Open GI operates in the B2B insurance technology market, targeting brokers, MGAs, and insurers. The company emphasizes its long-standing market experience and extensive user base, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the UK insurance ecosystem. The business model focuses on software-as-a-service and platform integration, supported by a partner network and customer support services. The presence of multiple embedded demo request forms indicates active lead generation efforts. The company maintains partnerships with numerous solution providers and insurers, enhancing its ecosystem and market reach. The website content and structure suggest a focus on scalability, customer engagement, and digital transformation within the insurance sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, reflecting GDPR compliance. Tracking and analytics are managed via reputable services like Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of a published security policy or incident response page represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS lookup failure is due to querying a subdomain rather than the registered domain and does not indicate a security risk. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and embedded forms to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Open GI
Description
Open GI provides innovative insurance software solutions tailored for brokers, MGAs, and insurers, focusing on policy administration, product management, self-serve digital solutions, and support services.
Key services
Policy Administration Systems, Insurer Hosted Pricing, Quote and Buy Websites, Customer Portals, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Solutions, Partner Network, Support Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, JotForm, Vimeo Player, GSAP, Swiper.js, PureCounter.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
JotForm
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on insurance software solutions for brokers, MGAs, and insurers.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  4. Multiple embedded forms for demo requests using JotForm.
  5. Active social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook.
  6. No exposed sensitive information or security issues detected in HTML.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to invalid query on subdomain, not domain.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including GSAP for animations, Swiper.js for sliders, and PureCounter.js for animated counters. It integrates third-party services such as Vimeo for video content, JotForm for form embedding, and Microsoft Clarity and Google Analytics for user behavior tracking. The site is hosted on Webflow's CDN, contributing to fast load times and excellent mobile optimization. SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags, alternate hreflang links, and structured navigation. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with opportunities for security hardening and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opengi.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opengi.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.