Skip to main content

Security report for openbiblio.social

Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin and Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin (ZLB) · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OpenBiblio.Social is a specialized Mastodon instance serving the German-speaking library and information professional community. It is hosted and administered by reputable public institutions, namely the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin and the Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin (ZLB). The platform provides a decentralized social media environment focused on fostering professional dialogue and networking within the library sector. The website content is primarily in German and offers clear guidance on community rules, moderation, and first steps for new users. Technically, the site leverages Mastodon 4.4.8, Ruby on Rails, and modern JavaScript frameworks, ensuring a contemporary and mobile-optimized user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is good with a clear privacy policy, but lacks cookie consent mechanisms and terms of service documentation. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness, supported by institutional backing and open-source transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching openbiblio.social

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention openbiblio.social, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for openbiblio.social.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche market position as a community-driven social media service tailored for library professionals in German-speaking countries. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on community service and professional networking rather than monetization. The backing by major public libraries provides strong trust signals and institutional credibility. The service benefits from open-source software and a federated social network model, enabling interoperability with other Mastodon instances. Growth potential is linked to the expansion of the library professional community within the Fediverse. Partnerships with related organizations like OpenBiblio.eu enhance its ecosystem. The absence of advertising and tracking tools aligns with the community-focused and privacy-respecting ethos of the platform.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. The use of open-source Mastodon software and hosting within a German institutional IT department suggests adherence to good security practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may be a minor compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security risk is low, but implementing recommended headers and policies would strengthen defenses and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  3. Publish terms of service and a security policy page to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Consider establishing an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) for reporting security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security documentation to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin and Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin (ZLB)
Description
A decentralized social media Mastodon instance serving as an entry point to the Fediverse for library and information professionals in German-speaking countries.
Key services
Mastodon social media hosting, Community moderation, Federated social networking for library professionals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Mastodon 4.4.8, Ruby on Rails, React, JavaScript ES Modules, SVG, Web Manifest
Frameworks
Mastodon, Rails
Platforms
Fediverse
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Mastodon instance focused on German-speaking library professionals.
  2. Content is in German with some English metadata.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses.
  5. Contact via official email provided.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. Privacy policy is present and appears GDPR compliant.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Site uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack centered around Mastodon 4.4.8, utilizing Ruby on Rails and React for frontend interactivity. The use of ES modules and integrity attributes on scripts indicates attention to security and performance. The site is mobile optimized and uses SVG graphics for logos and icons, contributing to fast load times and scalability. Hosting is managed by the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin IT department on servers located in Germany, ensuring data residency compliance. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, though accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is basic but sufficient for the target audience. The absence of cookie consent and terms of service pages are minor technical gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and well-suited for the community it serves.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with openbiblio.social. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review openbiblio.social.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.