Skip to main content

Security report for latvia-streets.openalfa.com

Technology · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Openalfa.com is a specialized online platform offering global street directories and city guides, leveraging open data from OpenStreetMap. The service targets a broad audience interested in geographic information, local services, and points of interest worldwide. The website has been operational since 2008, indicating a mature presence in the niche mapping sector. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, and Leaflet.js for interactive maps, with Cloudflare providing DNS services. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and a consent management system for cookies, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. No privacy policy or terms of service are published, which is a compliance gap. No direct contact information or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency. Advertising is integrated via Google AdSense and InMobi, with minimal user tracking observed. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security practices and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching latvia-streets.openalfa.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Openalfa operates in the technology sector, specifically in geographic information services. Its business model appears to be free access to mapping and directory data, monetized through advertising. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive global coverage and use of open data from OpenStreetMap. The target customers include individuals and businesses seeking location-based information worldwide. The long domain age and consistent branding support credibility. However, the lack of explicit business contact details and formal policies may limit trust for some users. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which is a gap in security transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides street directories and city guides for regions and towns worldwide, including maps and lists of commercial establishments, leisure places, services, and points of interest. The data is sourced and updated from OpenStreetMap.
Key services
street directories, city guides, maps, points of interest listings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1, Leaflet.js, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent management script for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, InMobi
Tracking pixels
InMobi Choice Consent Manager
Marketing tools
Consent Manager Tag v3.0 (InMobi)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides global street directory and mapping services using OpenStreetMap data.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via InMobi Choice Consent Manager.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  5. Advertising is present via Google AdSense and InMobi.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. Mobile optimization is basic but functional.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1, and Leaflet.js for map rendering. It relies on Cloudflare for DNS but does not enable DNSSEC. The site loads Google AdSense and InMobi scripts for advertising and consent management. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, with responsive design elements though mobile optimization is basic. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking beyond advertising scripts. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with latvia-streets.openalfa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latvia-streets.openalfa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.