Skip to main content

Security report for onlinetrader.lv

NORGATE.LV SIA · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NORGATE.LV SIA is a Latvian IT company specializing in innovative business software solutions tailored for various industries across Latvia and Europe. Their offerings include inventory management programs, CRM systems, e-commerce platforms, and custom software development, targeting businesses such as service companies, rental enterprises, retail chains, and manufacturing firms. The company positions itself as a pioneer in online business management systems in Latvia, emphasizing specialized and adaptable IT solutions. Technically, the website employs a traditional tech stack with jQuery 1.11.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. While the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and user-friendly, it uses an outdated jQuery version that poses security risks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks modern security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism and a cookie policy page, but no comprehensive privacy or terms of service pages are found. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business presence with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onlinetrader.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
45
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on B2B software solutions for business management. Their market positioning as early adopters of online business management in Latvia gives them a competitive edge. Key revenue streams likely include software licensing, custom development, and support services. The target customers are SMEs and enterprises in retail, service, rental, and manufacturing sectors. The company maintains active social media channels and integrates modern marketing tools, indicating a growth-oriented approach. The presence of client testimonials and detailed contact information supports trust and customer engagement. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Data protection officer contact information is not found. These gaps suggest limited formal security governance and incident readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data or credentials, which is positive. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and security policies, including terms of service and incident response procedures.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance and provide clear data retention and user privacy information to improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NORGATE.LV SIA
Registration number
50103608461
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NORGATE.LV SIA
Description
Mēs radam inovatīvus IT risinājumus uzņēmējiem Latvijā un Eiropā, piedāvājot dažādām nozarēm specializētas biznesa vadības sistēmas. Piedāvā noliktavas programmas, programmas autoservisam, e-komercijas risinājumus, CRM, autonomām, sastatņu, veidņu, torņu un instrumentu nomām, POS sistēmas veikaliem un kafejnīcām.
Key services
Noliktavas uzskaites programmas, Programmas autoservisam, E-komercijas risinājumi, CRM sistēmas, Biznesa vadības sistēmas, Mājas lapu izstrāde, Mobilās aplikācijas, Pielāgoti programmatūras risinājumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English options
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. Company contact details clearly provided in footer
  5. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern
  6. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found except cookie policy
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn
  9. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel used for tracking
  10. Good business branding and consistent design
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy jQuery 1.11.1 library, which is outdated and vulnerable. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts for typography. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of some resources. SEO is supported by meta keywords and descriptions, and structured navigation. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onlinetrader.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onlinetrader.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.