Skip to main content

Security report for onlinemarketingoutsourcing.com

Online marketing outsourcing · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Online Marketing Outsourcing is a small digital marketing agency specializing in providing full-service marketing outsourcing solutions including SEO, social media marketing, web design, and email marketing. The company targets businesses seeking to outsource their digital marketing efforts to improve efficiency and reduce costs. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO and MasterSlider, demonstrating a moderate level of digital maturity. While the site is well-structured and professionally designed, it lacks some privacy compliance features such as cookie consent and explicit GDPR indicators. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved by adding security headers and formal security policies. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the active social media presence and client testimonials support business credibility. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onlinemarketingoutsourcing.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on digital marketing outsourcing services. It maintains partnerships, such as with Sonrons, and offers a range of services from social media marketing to PPC advertising. The business model is service-oriented, targeting small to medium businesses looking to outsource marketing functions. The presence of case studies and testimonials indicates a focus on building trust and demonstrating results. The company appears to have been founded around 2014, aligning with the website content dates. Revenue streams likely include service contracts and white label marketing solutions. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with clients and prospects, supporting its market positioning as a specialized outsourcing provider.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site does not display explicit security policies or incident response contacts, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, indicating incomplete analytics setup. There is no cookie consent mechanism, which may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and trust.
  5. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove unused plugins to reduce attack surface and improve data accuracy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Online marketing outsourcing
Description
Outsource you online marketing with us! Concentrate at what you do the best and we will take care of the rest. Full service digital marketing agency,
Key services
Social Media Marketing, Search Engine Optimization and Marketing, Web Development and Design, Email and Mobile Marketing, Marketing Outsourcing Services, White Label Marketing Services, Pay Per Click Advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, MasterSlider, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Easy Social Share Buttons, Live Composer Page Builder, MonsterInsights (not configured)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Easy Social Share Buttons, Live Composer Page Builder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based digital marketing agency site with multiple service offerings.
  2. Content is professionally structured with clear navigation and service descriptions.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed including phone and email.
  4. Social media presence is active with links to major platforms.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, raising questions about domain registration legitimacy.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  8. Google Analytics plugin installed but not configured.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with no visible SSL issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a variety of plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, MasterSlider for visual content, and Easy Social Share Buttons for social media integration. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The technical implementation is modern but shows signs of partial configuration such as the unconfigured MonsterInsights plugin. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization present. Accessibility features are basic but could be enhanced. The site uses a custom theme with inline CSS and JavaScript for UI effects. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onlinemarketingoutsourcing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onlinemarketingoutsourcing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.