Skip to main content

Security report for onlinejungle.camp

onlinejungle.camp · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

onlinejungle.camp is a specialized B2B service provider focused on supporting camping sites with online sales and distribution solutions. As a 100% subsidiary of feratel media technologies GmbH, it leverages established technology platforms and extensive channel management capabilities to help camping businesses increase their online visibility and booking efficiency. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and targets camping site operators primarily in Germany. Technically, the site uses WordPress with modern themes and integrates Matomo analytics, showing a moderate to good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and nonce protections, but lacks some advanced security headers and public security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no visible privacy policy page. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected, which is typical for this business type, and no suspicious WHOIS data is found. The site maintains active social media engagement and publishes relevant industry news.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onlinejungle.camp

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a technology and consulting partner for the camping industry, differentiating from traditional booking portals by offering neutral, tailored solutions. Its business model revolves around enabling camping sites to efficiently manage online bookings across multiple platforms without requiring deep technical expertise. Partnerships with major portals like Booking.com, Airbnb, and specialized camping portals enhance its market reach. The parent company feratel provides a strong technological backbone with extensive integrations. The target customers are camping site operators seeking to optimize online sales channels. The company shows growth potential through active industry participation and new partnerships. The business is small-sized but well connected within its niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and use of nonce tokens in AJAX and REST API calls, reducing risks of CSRF attacks. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which could improve protection against clickjacking and XSS. No sensitive data or credentials are exposed in the HTML. There is no public security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page accessible from the homepage footer.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Provide visible terms of service and security policy pages to enhance trust and compliance.
  5. Consider publishing incident response contact information and data protection officer details if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
onlinejungle.camp
Description
Wir begleiten Campingplätze durch den Online-Dschungel und entwickeln maßgeschneiderte Online-Vertriebskonzepte, um Inventar einfach, schnell und ohne umfangreiches Fachwissen online zu verkaufen. Als 100% Tochterfirma der feratel media technologies GmbH bieten sie eine neutrale, umfassende und individuelle Lösung mit Fokus auf Technologie und Unterstützung, nicht als herkömmliches Portal.
Key services
360°-Analyse der Online-Vertriebspräsenz, Full-Service-Angebot für Onlinevertrieb, Technische Integration und Unterstützung, Markt- und Portalanalyse, Online Sichtbarkeit und Buchbarkeit, Channel-Management und Schnittstellen zu Buchungsportalen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Canvayo Theme, FontAwesome, Matomo Analytics, OpenStreetMap Tiles, AJAX, REST API
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in AJAX and REST calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Content is in German language targeting camping industry professionals
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found, but cookie consent is implemented
  4. Contact is primarily via a contact form on a dedicated contact page
  5. No direct email or phone number found in the visible content
  6. Strong branding and consistent design with professional imagery
  7. Active blog/news section with recent posts up to 2025
  8. Social media presence mainly on Instagram
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  10. No visible terms of service or security policy pages
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the Canvayo theme, integrating FontAwesome icons and Matomo analytics for tracking. It uses AJAX and REST API endpoints with nonce tokens for secure asynchronous operations. The site loads external resources from canvayo.com domains and OpenStreetMap tiles for mapping. Performance is moderate with responsive design and good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and structured Open Graph metadata. Accessibility features are implemented, including ARIA roles and keyboard navigation aids. The site hosts multimedia content including videos and images optimized for various screen sizes. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onlinejungle.camp. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onlinejungle.camp.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.