Skip to main content

Security report for online.fi

Online Solutions Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Online Solutions Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in eBusiness solutions, information security, and hosting services. The company leverages its proprietary eStage platform to deliver versatile eBusiness applications and emphasizes security and reliability in its hosting offerings. The website presents a professional image targeting business customers primarily in Finland, with a focus on quality and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including Bootstrap and JavaScript, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and formal policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie policy present but lacking a consent mechanism and no visible privacy policy page. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching online.fi

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention online.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
38
Employees
0
Customers
38
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
3%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for online.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a respected and profitable player in the Finnish technology sector, offering B2B services in eBusiness, security, and hosting. Its business model centers on providing integrated digital solutions and secure hosting environments compliant with Finnish regulatory standards. The presence of multiple related service domains indicates a broad ecosystem of offerings. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market presence and a focus on customer support. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the emphasis on quality and security suggests a premium service approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible external tracking or third-party cookies. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and no formal security or incident response policies are published. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files indicates limited transparency in security incident handling. Forms are protected by disabling submit buttons on submission, but no advanced anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms are visible. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet modern standards.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing certifications or compliance statements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Online Solutions Oy
Description
Oy Online Solutions Ltd has earned respect by bringing innovative yet well designed products/services to demanding Finnish market. The company offers eBusiness solutions via their eStage platform, information security services, and high quality hosting services focused on security, reliability, and speed.
Key services
eBusiness solutions, Information security, Hosting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (Bootstrap), JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by form action URL
  • No external tracking or third-party cookies used as per bottom alert

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the main page.
  3. Cookie policy is present but no explicit consent mechanism.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company emails and phone numbers.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Website uses HTTPS for form submission.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is business-focused and professional.
  9. No security certifications or compliance statements found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5, CSS with Bootstrap framework, and JavaScript for interactivity. It includes responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. The site loads moderately fast but lacks advanced performance optimizations such as lazy loading or CDN usage visible in the HTML. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses custom JavaScript for modal dialogs and user interaction. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords but no Open Graph or structured data found. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with online.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review online.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.