Skip to main content

Security report for cita-proza.onepage.me

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Onepage.io is a SaaS company offering a website, landing page, and funnel building platform targeted primarily at small businesses, agencies, and freelancers in German-speaking markets. The platform emphasizes ease of use, productivity, and scalability, positioning itself as a fast and clean alternative to WordPress. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, supported by Cloudflare DNS and CDN services. Analytics and marketing tools like Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, and Rewardful are integrated to support user engagement and advertising efforts. Security is well addressed with HTTPS, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and cookie consent mechanisms, although DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. The domain is privacy protected but has a long registration history consistent with a legitimate business. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image with good technical maturity and a solid security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cita-proza.onepage.me

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Onepage operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider for website and funnel creation, targeting German-speaking small businesses and agencies. Its competitive advantage lies in its simplicity, speed, and integrated features like CRM and team collaboration. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a free tier and paid plans. The company has built a significant user base with over 50,000 pages created and more than 3,000 customers. The use of privacy protection for domain registration is common in SaaS businesses and does not detract from legitimacy. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers to enhance its offering. Growth indicators include active testimonials and continuous feature updates.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, domain transfer protection, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The use of modern frameworks and hosting providers like Cloudflare adds to the security robustness. The lack of direct contact information for security incidents and no published vulnerability disclosure policy are gaps that could affect incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing clear policies and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for security issues.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security support.
  5. Implement and explicitly declare security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
Erstelle und verwalte Webseiten, Landingpages, Linktrees und mobile Funnel in wenigen Mausklicks - alles mit nur einem Tool. Nutze die erste Software, die deine Produktivität nachweislich deutlich steigert.
Key services
Landing pages, Websites, Quiz funnels, Linktrees, CRM integration, Team collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, Rewardful, Zapier integration
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Privacy protected WHOIS
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics via GTM, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Zapier
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on German-speaking market with localized content.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via external script.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Domain WHOIS privacy protection is used but justified.
  8. Security posture is good but could be improved with DNSSEC and explicit policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack using React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site uses multiple analytics and marketing tools integrated through Google Tag Manager and other scripts, enabling extensive user tracking and advertising capabilities. The site structure is well organized with clear navigation and rich content, although some standard compliance pages like privacy policy and terms of service are not found in the provided content. The technical implementation is robust with no visible errors or broken elements, supporting a good user experience and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cita-proza.onepage.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cita-proza.onepage.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.