Skip to main content

Security report for oneid.mk

Technology · North Macedonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OneID is a Macedonian digital identity service offering electronic identification and qualified electronic signature capabilities through a mobile application. The platform targets end users and companies requiring secure electronic identification and document signing, positioning itself as a national digital identity provider integrated with various sectors such as banking, insurance, telecommunications, and government services. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, primarily in Macedonian language, and provides detailed information about the service benefits and usage steps. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including AngularJS, Bootstrap, jQuery, and Lottie animations, indicating a maintained and moderately performant platform. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oneid.mk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital identity and electronic signature services. Its business model revolves around providing a secure, cloud-based qualified certificate and identification platform accessible via mobile apps on multiple platforms (Google Play, App Store, Huawei AppGallery). The target customers include individual users needing secure online identification and companies requiring electronic identification for their services. The company was founded in 2020 and appears to be a small-sized entity with a regional focus in North Macedonia. The website lacks explicit contact details and formal policies, which could be improved to enhance business credibility and customer trust. The partnership with KIBSTrust for cloud certificate storage is a key strategic asset.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of qualified electronic signature certificates stored securely in the cloud. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no security contact channels are visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected in the provided scripts, but regular updates and security audits are advised. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider publishing a security.txt file.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and frameworks to latest secure versions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
OneID is a digital personal identification service providing electronic identification and qualified electronic signature capabilities via a mobile application, enabling users to securely identify themselves and sign documents remotely.
Key services
Electronic identification, Qualified electronic signature, Secure login/authentication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.0.0, jQuery Migrate 1.4.1, RequireJS, AngularJS, Bootstrap, Lottie Player
Frameworks
AngularJS, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web, Mobile (via app)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • Use of qualified certificates for electronic signature
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Macedonian language targeting local users.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers are not explicitly present in the provided content.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks indicates a maintained platform.
  6. Focus on secure electronic identification and qualified electronic signatures.
  7. No visible advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of AngularJS, Bootstrap, jQuery, RequireJS, and Lottie animations to deliver a responsive and interactive user experience. The CMS appears custom-built (Nextsense), which may require dedicated maintenance. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized assets. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and mobile app promotion. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, but accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Hosting details are not explicit but domain name servers suggest local Macedonian infrastructure. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oneid.mk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oneid.mk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.