Skip to main content

Security report for omq.de

OMQ GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OMQ GmbH is a German technology company specializing in artificial intelligence solutions for customer service automation. Their website promotes AI-driven tools designed to automate customer inquiries, increase operational efficiency, and enhance customer satisfaction. The company targets businesses seeking to improve their customer service processes through AI technology. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern analytics and consent management tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Overall, the site demonstrates a trustworthy and professional presence consistent with a small but focused technology provider in the AI customer service sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omq.de

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention omq.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
23
Employees
0
Customers
23
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
17%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for omq.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OMQ GmbH operates in the technology sector with a focus on AI applications for customer service. Their business model appears to be B2B SaaS, offering AI automation tools to improve customer service efficiency. The company was founded in 2018 and maintains a consistent brand presence with clear messaging. Their market position is that of a specialized AI technology provider targeting enterprises and businesses looking to automate customer interactions. The use of Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager indicates compliance awareness and marketing sophistication. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company leverages partnerships with major cloud providers (AWS inferred) and analytics platforms to support their digital operations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited status on the domain, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. Analytics tools include Google Analytics and Posthog, with consent mechanisms in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Security headers are not explicitly confirmed but HTTPS presence suggests basic protections. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional published policies and DNSSEC activation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance transparency and compliance.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent and data retention policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OMQ GmbH
Description
Künstliche Intelligenz im Kundenservice ► Automatisiere Anfragen, steigere die Effizienz & verbessere die Kundenzufriedenheit.
Key services
AI-powered customer service automation, Inquiry automation, Efficiency improvement, Customer satisfaction enhancement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Posthog analytics, Cookiebot consent management, Tailwind CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Posthog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Posthog
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and focused on AI customer service solutions.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  5. Use of modern technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. Domain registration is consistent and legitimate.
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including Tailwind CSS for styling and integrates Google Tag Manager and Posthog for analytics and user behavior tracking. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS based on DNS servers. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by enabling DNSSEC and enhancing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omq.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omq.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.