Skip to main content

Security report for omms.lv

Olaines Mūzikas un mākslas skola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents Olaines Mūzikas un mākslas skola, a municipal music and arts school in Latvia. It serves as an informational portal for local residents and students interested in music and arts education. The site is hosted under the official olaine.lv domain, indicating municipal affiliation. The content is primarily in Latvian and focuses on educational services. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and Google Custom Search Engine. The presence of CSRF protection cookies and HTTPS indicates a baseline security posture. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as missing security headers, suggests room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is professional, accessible, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omms.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention omms.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for omms.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site targets local community members and students, positioning itself as a small-scale educational institution focused on music and arts. Its business model is public education, likely funded by municipal resources. The website supports the institution's mission by providing relevant information and services. The use of Google Analytics and Adsense indicates some monetization or tracking for performance and advertising. The partnership with visit.olaine.lv suggests integration with local municipal services. The lack of detailed business contact information or certifications limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF protection cookies, which are positive security indicators. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive and GDPR-aware, showing good privacy compliance efforts. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header implementation and publish security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to ensure no known vulnerabilities are present.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Olaines Mūzikas un mākslas skola
Description
Olaines Mūzikas un mākslas skola
Key services
Music education, Arts education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google Custom Search Engine, js-polyfills
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF protection cookie (_csrf-frontend)
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal educational site for Olaines Music and Arts School.
  2. Content is in Latvian language and relevant to local education services.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found or linked in the snippet.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Uses Google Analytics and Google Adsense for analytics and advertising.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, and Google Custom Search Engine integration. The presence of Yii framework CSRF tokens suggests a PHP-based backend framework. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous script loading. However, no CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and more comprehensive metadata for improved SEO and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omms.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omms.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.