Skip to main content

Security report for oktopost.com

Oktopost Technologies, Ltd. · Technology · Israel

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oktopost Technologies, Ltd. operates a sophisticated B2B social media management platform designed specifically for data-driven organizations seeking to optimize their social engagement and marketing efforts. The platform emphasizes LinkedIn-first publishing, employee advocacy, social listening, and marketing intelligence, leveraging AI to enhance content creation and engagement. Positioned as a trusted partner with thousands of global B2B marketing professionals, Oktopost offers a comprehensive SaaS solution that integrates with CRM and marketing automation tools to drive measurable business growth. Technically, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with extensive use of modern marketing and analytics technologies such as Marketo, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, SEO, and accessibility, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. The presence of multiple trust badges and certifications, including ISO 27001, further reinforces the company’s commitment to security and compliance. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs various tracking and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously to minimize performance impact. While no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the absence of certain security headers and a public incident response contact are areas for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data is notable and suggests either privacy protection or a technical anomaly, which slightly impacts the overall trust assessment. Overall, Oktopost presents a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious online presence suitable for its B2B audience. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and clarifying domain registration details to improve transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain blog.oktopost.com points to unregistered service oktopost-38480929.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oktopost.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oktopost.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
198
Employees
3
Customers
184
Third parties
11
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-02-22 · 7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for oktopost.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –app.oktopost.com2026-02-22
  • –demo.oktopost.com2025-07-22
  • –app.oktopost.com2025-07-17

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oktopost holds a strong market position as a specialized B2B social media management platform with a focus on LinkedIn and AI-driven social engagement. Its business model centers on SaaS subscriptions targeting marketing, sales, and HR teams within technology and business services sectors. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook, and Adobe, enhancing its ecosystem and credibility. Revenue streams likely include tiered subscription plans and enterprise solutions. The company’s content strategy, including case studies, podcasts, and webinars, supports customer education and retention. Growth indicators include a broad customer base, industry certifications, and continuous product updates. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the company’s operational transparency and market presence.

Security posture

Oktopost demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and ISO 27001 certification prominently displayed, indicating adherence to recognized information security management standards. The use of asynchronous loading for tracking and analytics scripts reduces performance risks. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no publicly available incident response or security contact information, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and response. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and publishing a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response and vulnerability disclosure page with clear contact channels to improve security transparency and responsiveness.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and WHOIS information to enhance trust and reduce ambiguity regarding domain legitimacy.
  5. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and update privacy and cookie policies regularly to reflect evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Oktopost Technologies, Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oktopost Technologies, Ltd.
Description
Oktopost is a B2B social engagement suite that supports modern data-driven organizations. It empowers users to engage with prospects and customers, scale programs, and drive business growth with AI-driven tools.
Key services
Social Management, Employee Advocacy, Social Listening, Marketing Intelligence, Social Analytics, Customer Engagement, Integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Marketo, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, ZoomInfo Pixel, ClickCease, Hotjar, Swipe.js
Platforms
Marketo, Google Analytics, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Marketing
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, ZoomInfo Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, ZoomInfo Pixel, ClickCease
Marketing tools
Marketo, Hotjar, ClickCease
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at B2B marketers.
  3. Strong use of marketing and analytics technologies.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  7. Multiple trust badges and certifications enhance credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies and integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Marketo, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. The asynchronous loading of scripts optimizes page load performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is well-implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data enhancing search engine visibility and social sharing. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a fast, reliable, and user-friendly experience with minimal technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oktopost.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oktopost.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.