Skip to main content

Security report for okta.com

Okta, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

91/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Okta, Inc. is a leading enterprise identity and access management provider offering cloud-based solutions that enable secure authentication, single sign-on, adaptive multi-factor authentication, and identity governance. The company serves a broad range of industries and targets IT professionals, developers, and enterprises seeking robust identity security solutions. Their platform integrates the Auth0 subsidiary, enhancing customer identity capabilities. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content focused on business security and growth. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Adobe Experience Manager, integrates marketing and analytics tools like Marketo and Google Tag Manager, and employs strong security practices including HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. Okta demonstrates a strong security posture with multiple certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2, FedRAMP) and transparent incident response channels. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is justified for a large enterprise. Overall, the website and business exhibit high credibility, security maturity, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of okta.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching okta.com

This scan found 7 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
75
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
91

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention okta.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
296,006
Employees
104
Customers
295,567
Third parties
335
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-12 · 13,761 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for okta.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –nisayuputusriadnyanigmailcom.okta.com2026-06-12
  • –nisayuputusriadnyanigmailcom.okta.com2026-06-11
  • –gs-marcus.okta.com2026-06-06
  • –okta.okta.com2026-05-28
  • –dev-7570149-admin.okta.com2026-05-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Okta holds a strong market position as a cloud identity provider with a comprehensive product suite addressing workforce and customer identity needs. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting large enterprises and developers. The integration of Auth0 expands their market reach into customer identity and access management. Okta's ecosystem includes partnerships and a broad integration network, supporting scalability and innovation. The company emphasizes security certifications and compliance, which are critical for their target sectors such as technology, finance, healthcare, and government. Growth indicators include active marketing, developer community engagement, and continuous product updates. Okta's transparent trust and security commitments enhance customer confidence and competitive advantage.

Security posture

Okta's security posture is robust, evidenced by enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and adherence to industry standards and certifications. The presence of a dedicated security incident response page and contact channels indicates readiness for threat management. The website employs secure form handling with email hashing and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The company maintains transparency on data protection and incident response, reflecting a mature security culture. Recommendations include ongoing library updates and enhanced user privacy education to maintain and improve security resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain continuous monitoring and timely updates of third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Enhance transparency and user education regarding data retention and privacy controls.
  3. Conduct regular penetration testing and security audits to identify and remediate potential risks.
  4. Strengthen incident response communication channels and user awareness.
  5. Invest in long-term security strategy focusing on emerging identity threats and compliance evolution.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Okta, Inc.
Description
The Okta and Auth0 Platforms enable secure access, authentication, and automation—putting Identity at the heart of business security and growth.
Key services
Single Sign-On, Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication, Identity Governance, Privileged Access Management, Identity Threat Protection, Customer Identity Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Helix RUM, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Vidyard video player
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager, Alpine.js (x-data directives)
Platforms
Cloud-based hosting, CDN usage (Google Tag Manager, Marketo)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Secure forms with hashing for emails
  • Use of adaptive MFA and identity threat protection products
  • Incident response contact info publicly available

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin
Marketing tools
Marketo, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on identity and access management solutions.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple security certifications and incident response info publicly available.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and marketing analytics tools.
  7. Clear contact information including phone and sales contact forms.
  8. No WHOIS data publicly available, likely privacy protected domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and cloud hosting infrastructure. It integrates marketing automation (Marketo), analytics (Google Tag Manager), and consent management (OneTrust), reflecting a mature digital marketing and compliance approach. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and CDN usage. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with structured metadata and SEO best practices implemented. Technical risks are minimal, with no detected outdated or vulnerable components. Opportunities exist to further enhance accessibility and streamline consent management for improved user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 91/100 +2Low15 findingsView report
  2. 89/100Low14 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium3 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with okta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review okta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.