Skip to main content

Security report for okta.com

Okta · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

89/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Okta is a leading enterprise identity and access management platform that provides secure authentication, authorization, and automation services for businesses globally. The company offers comprehensive solutions including workforce identity, customer identity, multifactor authentication, and identity governance. Okta's market position is strong, supported by a large customer base, extensive integrations, and industry recognition such as Gartner Peer Insights. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager with modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly found. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of okta.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching okta.com

This scan found 8 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
75
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
89

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention okta.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
296,006
Employees
104
Customers
295,567
Third parties
335
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-12 · 13,761 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for okta.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –nisayuputusriadnyanigmailcom.okta.com2026-06-12
  • –nisayuputusriadnyanigmailcom.okta.com2026-06-11
  • –gs-marcus.okta.com2026-06-06
  • –okta.okta.com2026-05-28
  • –dev-7570149-admin.okta.com2026-05-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Okta operates primarily in the technology sector, targeting enterprise customers requiring secure identity solutions. Its business model is SaaS-based, generating revenue through subscriptions to its identity platforms. The company leverages a strong partner ecosystem, including its subsidiary Auth0, to expand market reach. Okta's competitive advantages include platform neutrality, extensibility, and a broad integration network. The website content and structure indicate a focus on IT professionals, developers, and business decision-makers. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns, event promotion (Oktane), and continuous product innovation. Strategic partnerships and a comprehensive resource library support customer success and retention.

Security posture

Okta's security posture is strong, with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive information detected on the website. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates compliance with data protection laws. However, the absence of a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file and incident response contact details suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. The company demonstrates a mature security culture aligned with industry best practices, but enhancing public security communication would further strengthen trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and marketing tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  4. Enhance documentation on data retention policies and user data handling to bolster privacy compliance.
  5. Continue investing in accessibility improvements to maintain high standards for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Okta
Description
The Okta and Auth0 Platforms enable secure access, authentication, and automation—putting Identity at the heart of business security and growth.
Key services
Workforce Identity, Customer Identity, Single Sign-On, Adaptive Multifactor Authentication, Identity Governance, Privileged Access, Identity Threat Protection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, Marketo Munchkin, Drift chat widget, OneTrust cookie consent
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Marketo Munchkin, Adobe Helix RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo, Drift
Marketing tools
Marketo, Drift, Adobe Launch
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging around identity management.
  3. Multiple calls to action for free trial and contact sales.
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of phishing or malware.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, and Drift chat. Performance is optimized with lazy loading images and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting details are not explicitly found but the use of Adobe and cloud-based services suggests a scalable and reliable infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve transparency around security disclosures and data retention. Overall, the technical implementation supports a high-quality user experience and robust business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 91/100Low15 findingsView report
  2. 91/100Low13 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium3 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with okta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review okta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.