Skip to main content

Security report for oig.nl

Onderwijs Innovatie Groep · Education · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Onderwijs Innovatie Groep (OIG) is a Dutch company founded in 2009 specializing in accelerating data-driven innovation within the education sector. They provide a Data Insights Platform and consultancy services to help educational institutions develop and implement data-driven products and services successfully. Their market position is niche but credible, supported by their membership in the Microsoft Start-Up program, which enhances their technological capabilities and trustworthiness. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and content-rich, targeting education professionals and institutions. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and Contentful CMS, with integrations for Google Analytics and Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible cookie consent and comprehensive privacy and terms documents. Overall, the website and business present a trustworthy, professional, and well-structured digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oig.nl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OIG operates in the education sector focusing on data-driven innovation, offering a combination of platform technology and consulting services. Their business model is B2B, targeting educational institutions and related organizations. They emphasize cloud technologies, particularly Microsoft Azure, and maintain strategic partnerships such as the Microsoft Start-Up program. The company showcases a small but specialized team with clear career opportunities and client engagement strategies. Their market presence is supported by detailed case studies, client testimonials, and a professional team, indicating a growth-oriented and credible organization within their niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy align with GDPR requirements, reflecting good compliance practices. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security governance and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Onderwijs Innovatie Groep
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Onderwijs Innovatie Groep
Description
Sinds 2009 helpt Onderwijs Innovatie Groep (OIG) met sneller en succesvoller data-gedreven innovatie in het onderwijs. Met ons Data Platform en onze Consultancy diensten faciliteren wij onze klanten om data gedreven producten en diensten te ontwikkelen en succesvol te implementeren binnen onderwijsinstellingen.
Key services
Data Insights Platform, Consulting, Implementation and Adoption Training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Contentful CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js, Chakra UI
Platforms
Contentful
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on data-driven innovation in education sector.
  3. Clear contact information and professional team presentation.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Next.js, Contentful).
  5. Good privacy and cookie compliance with visible consent banner.
  6. Microsoft partnership adds credibility and trust.
  7. No security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, leveraging Contentful as a headless CMS. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Chakra UI for styling, ensuring a consistent and responsive design. Performance is moderate with preloading of critical assets and asynchronous loading of scripts. No hosting provider details were explicitly detected. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some accessibility improvements could be made. The use of cloud technologies and Microsoft partnership suggests a scalable and future-proof infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oig.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oig.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.