Skip to main content

Security report for ogimage.gallery

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OGimage.gallery is a niche online gallery specializing in curated Open Graph (OG) images, targeting web developers, designers, and marketers who seek high-quality OG images for their websites and projects. The site offers a searchable resource of hand-picked OG images with preview and submission capabilities, positioning itself as a specialized content provider within the technology and web design sector. The business model is primarily content curation without direct commercial transactions evident on the site. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and Plausible Analytics for tracking. The hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains a clean and professional design with clear navigation. Security posture is basic; HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers are detected. The site does not collect personal data or set cookies, which reduces privacy risks but also limits compliance transparency as no privacy or cookie policies are present. No contact or incident response information is provided, which could hinder trust and security communication. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and contact transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ogimage.gallery. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ogimage.gallery

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
60
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a specialized audience in the technology and web design industry, providing a curated gallery of OG images. It leverages partnerships and references to many reputable technology domains, indicating a broad ecosystem engagement. The business operates as a small entity focused on content curation rather than direct sales or services. The lack of explicit business information, contact details, or certifications suggests a lean operation. The use of Webflow CMS and hosting indicates a modern, low-maintenance technical approach. The site’s growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and improving compliance and trust signals. The presence of a Twitter account suggests some social media engagement for marketing and community building.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden security against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site does not collect personal data or set cookies, reducing privacy risks but also limiting GDPR compliance transparency. The lack of contact information for security incidents or vulnerability disclosure reduces incident response readiness. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a content gallery but requiring improvements for higher trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  3. Add explicit contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Gallery with the best and most carefully collected OG images.
Key services
curated OG image gallery, searchable OG image resources, preview and submission of OG images
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No personal data collected
  • No cookies set

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Site uses Webflow CMS and hosting with jQuery and Plausible Analytics.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  6. No evidence of data collection beyond minimal analytics.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure.
  9. Site branding and design are consistent and professional.
  10. External links point to many reputable technology and design-related domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow’s platform, using jQuery 3.5.1 and Plausible Analytics for minimal tracking. The site loads CSS and JavaScript assets from CDN.prod.website-files.com, indicating a CDN-backed delivery for performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern image formats (WebP) for efficient loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Card metadata. No advanced JavaScript frameworks or backend technologies are evident. The site’s performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. Technical debt appears low due to the use of a managed CMS platform, but opportunities exist to improve security and privacy compliance through configuration and content additions.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ogimage.gallery. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ogimage.gallery.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.