Skip to main content

Security report for ogimage.gallery

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OGimage.gallery is a niche content curation platform offering a gallery of hand-picked Open Graph images primarily targeting web developers, designers, and marketers who need high-quality OG images for their websites or projects. The site provides categorized collections, a search feature, and user submission capabilities, positioning itself as a specialized resource in the digital design ecosystem. The business model revolves around content curation and community contributions, supported by a Webflow CMS infrastructure and hosted on Webflow's CDN for reliable delivery. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including jQuery and Webflow's platform, with a focus on responsive design and moderate performance. It integrates Plausible Analytics, a privacy-conscious analytics service, indicating an awareness of user privacy concerns. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and no contact or business registration information is publicly available, which limits transparency. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids setting cookies or collecting personal data, which reduces risk exposure. Nonetheless, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and contact information also represents compliance and trust gaps. Overall, OGimage.gallery presents as a legitimate, small-scale content curation site with good design and technical implementation but with room for improvement in privacy compliance, security best practices, and business transparency. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen user trust and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ogimage.gallery

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
60
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OGimage.gallery occupies a niche market segment focused on providing curated Open Graph images, a valuable asset for digital marketing and web development. Its competitive advantage lies in the quality and curation of content rather than scale or broad service offerings. The business model appears to be content-driven with potential for community engagement through submissions and browser extension usage. Revenue streams are not explicit but could include affiliate links or partnerships. The target customer segment includes designers, developers, and marketers seeking inspiration or ready-to-use OG images. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of public business data. The partnership ecosystem includes integration with Webflow and Plausible Analytics, reflecting a modern, privacy-aware technology stack. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding business transparency and compliance to enhance credibility and potential monetization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and no personal data collection or cookies set, minimizing attack surface and privacy risks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth capabilities. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site uses AJAX for form submissions with error handling, indicating some attention to secure user interactions. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, limiting transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard security headers, documented policies, and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a security or abuse contact email to support incident response readiness.
  4. Consider adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policy pages to increase transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid potential vulnerabilities and maintain technical hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Gallery with the best and most carefully collected OG images.
Key services
Curated gallery of Open Graph images, Searchable categories of OG images, Submission of OG images by users, Browser extension for OG image preview
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No personal data collected
  • No cookies set

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a curated gallery of Open Graph images for designers and developers.
  2. No WHOIS data available; domain privacy likely enabled.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Uses Webflow CMS and CDN for hosting and content delivery.
  6. Uses Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused visitor tracking.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No forms collecting personal data except a search form and a submission form using AJAX.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. External links mostly to partner or related service domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 3.5.1 and custom JavaScript for enhanced interactivity, including AJAX form submissions. It is hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery and moderate performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph metadata for social sharing. Analytics are handled by Plausible Analytics, a privacy-focused service. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated further by adding security headers and improving accessibility compliance. The site architecture supports scalability for content additions and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ogimage.gallery. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ogimage.gallery.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.