Skip to main content

Security report for og-studio.be

OG Studio · Technology · Belgium

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OG Studio is a Belgium-based full stack Web3 agency specializing in community building, education, strategy, and development services for Web3 projects and brands. The company targets businesses seeking to leverage blockchain, NFTs, and metaverse technologies to engage their audiences and build future-proof communities. The website demonstrates a strong market position within the niche Web3 consulting sector, supported by notable client logos and positive testimonials. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries including Web3.js, WalletConnect, Magic SDK, and Splide.js for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and uses Typekit fonts for branding consistency. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and well-structured with good SEO and accessibility practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks some security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data is restricted due to DNS Belgium policies, limiting domain registration transparency but this is typical for .be domains and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, OG Studio presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound online presence suitable for its business model. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security headers would enhance its posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching og-studio.be

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OG Studio operates in the emerging Web3 technology sector, focusing on community engagement and blockchain education. Its competitive advantage lies in combining strategic consulting with hands-on development and education services. The business model is service-oriented, targeting brands and projects aiming to adopt Web3 technologies. Revenue streams likely include consulting fees, workshop delivery, and development contracts. The company has established partnerships and client relationships with recognized brands such as Adidas and the European Parliament, indicating a growing ecosystem and market credibility. The presence of a podcast and blog suggests active content marketing and thought leadership efforts to expand reach and influence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no apparent exposure of sensitive information. The use of modern libraries and SDKs indicates up-to-date technology adoption. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a cookie consent banner are gaps in compliance and security best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to demonstrate readiness and transparency. Overall, the security risks are low but can be mitigated further by implementing recommended headers and privacy mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and legal clarity.
  4. Consider adding incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to facilitate reporting and response.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and SDKs to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OG Studio
Description
OG Studio is a full stack Web3 studio based in Belgium offering Education, Strategy and Development services in Web3 for leading projects and brands.
Key services
Community Building, Web3 Education, Web3 Strategy, Web3 Development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Splide.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Magic SDK, WalletConnect, Web3.js, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements.
  2. Strong focus on Web3 community building and education services.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and integrations with Web3 wallets and Magic SDK.
  4. No visible security or privacy policy gaps except missing cookie consent mechanism.
  5. WHOIS data is restricted, common for .be domains with privacy protection.
  6. Multiple client logos and testimonials enhance trustworthiness.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging its CMS capabilities for dynamic content such as blogs and case studies. It uses jQuery and Splide.js for interactive UI components like accordions and sliders. Integration with Web3 technologies is evident through WalletConnect and Web3.js libraries, enabling blockchain wallet connectivity. The Magic SDK is used for passwordless authentication. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are employed for user tracking and analytics. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and uses Typekit fonts for consistent branding. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable performance and HTTPS support. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a Web3-focused agency, with opportunities to enhance security headers and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with og-studio.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review og-studio.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.