Skip to main content

Security report for officecommunity.com

Corel Corporation · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WordPerfect, under Corel Corporation, offers a legacy office suite product line targeting individuals, businesses, and educational institutions. The website provides comprehensive support resources including tutorials, downloads, orders, and account management. The business model centers on software sales and licensing with a focus on niche market segments. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, and Optimizely, indicating a mature digital infrastructure with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page is noted. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the lack of WHOIS registration data for the domain www.wordperfect.com is a concern, suggesting possible privacy protection or domain aliasing. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency in security policies and domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching officecommunity.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WordPerfect maintains a solid market position as a legacy office suite provider with a focus on individual and institutional customers. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized office suite features and licensing options for business and education sectors. Revenue streams are primarily from software sales, corporate licenses, and educational licenses. The partnership with Alludo for branding and site redesign indicates strategic collaboration to enhance market presence. The company targets a broad audience including students, professionals, and organizations. Growth indicators include active support resources and promotional offers. The ecosystem includes Corel Corporation as the parent company and related domains for licensing and support. The website's professional content and trust signals support business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. Use of security and privacy scripts, along with TrustedSite certification, enhances trust. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contact, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in security transparency and readiness. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the analysis. The site uses multiple tracking and marketing scripts which are managed responsibly with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and standards.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Corel Corporation
Description
WordPerfect Office is a leading office suite offering products for individuals, businesses, and education sectors. The site provides customer service, product registration, downloads, tutorials, and support resources.
Key services
Office suite software, Product support and customer service, Licensing programs, Educational licenses, PDF tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, Web Vitals, Magnific Popup, Syotimer
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW- IDs)
Tracking pixels
Optimizely
Marketing tools
Optimizely, Dynamic Pricing Scripts
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professional and well-structured
  3. Strong branding consistent with Corel Corporation
  4. Multiple contact options including phone and chat
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and lowers trust score
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Tag Manager, and Optimizely for A/B testing and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloading of fonts and scripts to improve performance. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the use of CDN and Google services suggests a robust infrastructure. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. There is some technical debt indicated by use of Bootstrap 3 (an older version) and multiple tracking scripts which could be consolidated. Overall, the technical implementation supports a stable and professional user experience with opportunities for modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with officecommunity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review officecommunity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.