Skip to main content

Security report for office.com

Microsoft · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Email security.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.office.com is the official Microsoft portal for Microsoft 365 Copilot and Office Online services. It provides cloud-based productivity tools including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote, integrated with OneDrive for online collaboration. The site targets both individual users and businesses, positioning Microsoft as a market leader in productivity software and cloud services. The business model is subscription-based, leveraging Microsoft's extensive cloud infrastructure and brand recognition. Technically, the site is well-constructed using modern web technologies, hosted on Microsoft Azure and CDN networks, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring clear privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity, consistent with Microsoft's enterprise-grade standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching office.com

This scan found 9 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
60
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Microsoft maintains a dominant market position in productivity and cloud services, with www.office.com serving as a key access point for Microsoft 365 users. The site supports a subscription revenue model and targets a broad audience from individuals to enterprises. The integration with other Microsoft domains and services reflects a strong partnership ecosystem and a unified cloud platform strategy. The absence of direct contact information on the main page suggests reliance on centralized Microsoft support channels. The website's branding and content quality reinforce Microsoft's reputation and trust in the technology sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Use of Microsoft Clarity and Azure monitoring indicates active analytics and performance tracking while maintaining privacy compliance. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are directly linked on the main page, which could be improved for transparency. The lack of WHOIS data is typical for large enterprises using privacy or registry protections and does not detract from legitimacy. Overall, the site aligns with best practices for enterprise web security and privacy.

Recommendations

  1. Enhance visibility of security policies and incident response contacts to improve user trust and transparency.
  2. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics to ensure no privacy or security risks.
  3. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Maintain up-to-date security headers and SSL configurations to stay ahead of emerging threats.
  5. Improve contact information accessibility for enterprise clients seeking direct support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Microsoft
Description
Collaborate for free with online versions of Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, Excel, and OneNote. Save documents, workbooks, and presentations online, in OneDrive. Share them with others and work together at the same time.
Key services
Microsoft 365 Copilot, Office Online apps (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote), OneDrive cloud storage, Collaboration tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Microsoft CDN, Microsoft Clarity (analytics), Azure monitoring scripts
Platforms
Microsoft 365, OneDrive
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Azure monitoring
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, Azure monitoring scripts
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and focused on Microsoft 365 productivity services.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are present.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy or registry policies.
  6. Use of Microsoft-owned domains and CDNs for resources.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  8. Use of Microsoft Clarity analytics and Azure monitoring scripts.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, served via Microsoft Azure and CDN infrastructure. Performance is optimized with preloaded fonts and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features and SEO meta tags are well implemented. The site is mobile responsive and uses Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics. No CMS is explicitly detected, likely a custom Microsoft platform. Hosting and infrastructure are robust, supporting enterprise scale and reliability. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities to enhance security transparency and incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 −17Medium18 findingsView report
  2. 88/100 +12Low18 findingsView report
  3. 76/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with office.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review office.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.