Skip to main content

Security report for odyzeo.com

Odyzeo Services · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Odyzeo Services operates as a small UX/UI design and development studio based in Slovakia, focusing on helping companies achieve their vision through design, prototyping, testing, and algorithmic solutions. The website presents a professional image with consistent branding and clear service offerings targeted at businesses seeking digital design and development expertise. The technical infrastructure includes modern tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Lead Forensics, with a custom CMS (ZeoCMS) powering the site. The site is mobile-optimized and uses reCAPTCHA to secure its contact form, indicating attention to user experience and basic security. However, the absence of visible security headers and privacy/cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and security transparency. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the active and professional website mitigates some risk. Overall, the site scores moderately on security and privacy, with recommendations to enhance policy disclosures and security headers to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching odyzeo.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention odyzeo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for odyzeo.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Odyzeo positions itself as a niche UX/UI and development service provider in the Slovak market, targeting companies needing integrated design and functional code solutions. The business model is service-oriented, relying on project-based engagements. The presence of social media links and tracking tools indicates an active marketing approach. Lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits transparency. The company appears to maintain a focused portfolio with no visible subsidiaries or partners. Growth potential may be tied to expanding digital transformation demand in the region. Strategic partnerships or certifications could enhance market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and CAPTCHA protection on forms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency on handling security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. No DNSSEC information is available, and WHOIS data is missing, which could indicate privacy protection or domain registration issues. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Clarify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and accessible.
  4. Add explicit security and incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Odyzeo Services
Description
Analyzujeme, vytvárame prototypy, testujeme a ponúkame riešenia, či už vo forme dizajnu, alebo algoritmov.
Key services
UX/UI design, prototyping, testing, algorithmic solutions, functional code development, integration services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v2, custom CSS and JS, SVG graphics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • use of HTTPS (implied by og:url https)
  • reCAPTCHA on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords
Tracking pixels
Lead Forensics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Slovak language with English language option.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  4. Contact information includes phone number and physical address in Bratislava, Slovakia.
  5. Contact form includes CAPTCHA for spam protection.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Lead Forensics for tracking and marketing.
  7. No visible security headers in HTML source.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS (ZeoCMS) with modern front-end technologies including CSS animations and SVG graphics. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site loads moderate resources and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or errors are visible in the HTML source. However, the absence of security headers and incomplete policy disclosures indicate areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not evident from the source. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and script management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with odyzeo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review odyzeo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.