Oxford, Cambridge and RSA · Education · United Kingdom
Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.
Oxford, Cambridge and RSA (OCR) is a well-established awarding body providing a wide range of educational qualifications including GCSEs, A Levels, Cambridge Nationals, and Cambridge Technicals. The organization operates under the Cambridge Assessment umbrella, positioning itself as a trusted and authoritative provider in the UK education sector. The website offers comprehensive resources, past papers, and support for both students and educators, reflecting a strong commitment to educational excellence and accessibility. Technically, the website employs a mature technology stack including jQuery, JW Player, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for consent management. The site is well-structured with good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. The presence of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to user engagement and experience enhancement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates consent management for privacy compliance. However, there is room for improvement in implementing additional HTTP security headers and updating legacy libraries such as jQuery. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, indicating a solid security posture. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with relevant privacy regulations. The lack of WHOIS data for the exact queried domain is due to it being a subdomain, which is typical for large organizations. The domain and website content align well, supporting the legitimacy of the entity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, updating legacy scripts, and continuous privacy compliance monitoring.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention ocr.org.uk, from OffSeq Breach.
23 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ocr.org.uk.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ocr.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ocr.org.uk.