Skip to main content

Security report for ocean.lv

Ocean Group Ltd. · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ocean Multimedia Studio is a specialized technology service provider based in Latvia, focusing on the creation of immersive VR, AR, and 360° content including aerial panoramas, virtual tours, 3D modeling, and virtual museums. Their market position is that of a niche player offering professional multimedia visualization services primarily targeting businesses and organizations seeking advanced digital content solutions. The website showcases a well-structured portfolio and clear service offerings, indicating a focused business model centered on immersive media production. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and WPML for multilingual support. The site uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, though accessibility features are basic. The technical infrastructure reflects a standard small business digital presence with room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and some form protections on forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security or incident response policies. No privacy or cookie policies were found, and GDPR compliance indicators are minimal. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which limits domain trust assessment. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better policy transparency and technical controls. The overall risk assessment suggests a legitimate and professional business with moderate digital maturity. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and improving accessibility and compliance measures to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ocean.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ocean.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ocean.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ocean Multimedia Studio operates in the immersive media technology sector, offering VR/AR and 360° content creation services. Their competitive advantage lies in their specialized expertise in aerial panoramas, virtual museums, and 3D modeling, serving a niche market. The business model is service-oriented, targeting clients needing advanced digital visualization. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts for virtual tours, AR apps, and 3D reconstructions. The target customers include cultural institutions, real estate, education, and tourism sectors. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains like latviainside.com, indicating collaboration or content sharing. Growth indicators include a regularly updated portfolio and multilingual site support. Strategic observations note the need for enhanced privacy and security transparency to support business credibility and compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, which are positive controls. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of incident response contact information. Data protection practices are not explicitly documented. Incident response readiness is unclear, and no security culture indicators are visible on the site. To improve, the company should implement security headers, publish privacy and security policies, and establish a vulnerability disclosure process. These steps will reduce risk and enhance trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ocean Group Ltd.
Description
Professional creation of interactive 360 degree aerial panoramas and virtual tours, 3D modeling and mapping services, content creation for virtual museums.
Key services
Augmented Reality development, 3D Modeling & Visualisation, Virtual Museums & Interactive Expositions, 360° Immersive Imaging & Virtual Tour Production, Aerial HD 360° Panoramas & Aerial Virtual Tours
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Slider Revolution, Lightbox Plus Colorbox, WPBakery Page Builder, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms include hidden tokens for CSRF protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress site focused on VR/AR and 360° content creation.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain email and phone number.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust assessment.
  6. Site uses modern plugins and technologies but lacks some security headers.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking with no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  8. Site content is rich with portfolio examples and clear service descriptions.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and WPML for multilingual support. The site loads multiple external resources such as Google Fonts and Google Analytics. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers and limited accessibility features indicate technical debt and modernization opportunities. The site could benefit from improved caching, minification, and security hardening to reduce risks and improve user experience. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ocean.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ocean.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.