Skip to main content

Security report for obisk.si

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website obisk.si serves as a Matomo analytics platform login portal, primarily targeting website administrators and analytics users. It provides access to a free/libre analytics platform designed to track and analyze website visitor data with a focus on privacy. The platform is positioned as an open-source alternative to commercial analytics services, offering key services such as web analytics, user behavior tracking, and privacy compliance tools. The domain is registered since 2020, consistent with the platform's operational timeline. Technically, the site employs a modern JavaScript-based frontend (AngularJS) and a PHP backend typical of Matomo installations. It uses HTTPS with token-based authentication and supports two-factor authentication, indicating a reasonable security posture. However, the site lacks visible security headers and publicly accessible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses authentication tokens, but it does not publicly disclose incident response or security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and contact information reduces the site's privacy compliance score. The WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a legitimate domain registration. Overall, the site is functional and secure for its intended purpose as an analytics platform login but lacks public-facing compliance and contact information. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact channels to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obisk.si

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Obisk.si operates as a portal for the Matomo analytics platform, which is an open-source web analytics solution. The business model revolves around providing privacy-focused analytics tools to website owners and administrators. The target audience includes small to medium-sized businesses and organizations seeking alternatives to commercial analytics platforms. The platform's market position is that of a reputable open-source solution with a growing user base. Revenue streams likely include premium plugins and services offered by Matomo. The company benefits from partnerships with registrars like Openprovider and the broader Matomo community. Growth indicators include the platform's continuous updates and community engagement. No direct parent or subsidiary companies were identified.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and token-based authentication is implemented, including support for two-factor authentication, which enhances account security. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No public security or incident response policies are available, which limits transparency. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the analyzed content. The platform should improve privacy compliance by publishing privacy and cookie policies and providing incident response contact channels. Overall, the site demonstrates a reasonable security maturity level but can benefit from enhanced transparency and additional security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the login page.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Enhance transparency by publishing a security policy and incident response procedures.
  5. Regularly audit and update the platform to ensure no vulnerable libraries or components are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Matomo is a free/libre analytics platform.
Key services
Web analytics, User behavior tracking, Privacy-focused analytics
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo analytics platform, JavaScript tracking, PHP backend
Frameworks
AngularJS (ng-app attribute)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Token authentication used
  • Two-factor authentication referenced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Matomo analytics platform login page, not a public business website.
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact information or business addresses are publicly visible.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and token-based authentication with anonymous user fallback.
  5. No external advertising or affiliate links detected.
  6. Content is minimal and focused on user login and analytics configuration.
  7. No WAF or security challenge detected; site is accessible.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Matomo analytics platform with a frontend built on AngularJS and a PHP backend. The tracking code is implemented with JavaScript and supports image tracking as a fallback. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating good transport security. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updates to frameworks and improved frontend optimization. No CMS is detected, as Matomo is a standalone analytics platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for its purpose but has room for modernization and enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obisk.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obisk.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.