Skip to main content

Security report for oberoi-is.org

Oberoi International School · Education · India

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oberoi International School is a leading private international school in Mumbai, India, offering the full International Baccalaureate continuum from Nursery through Grade 12. The school is highly ranked nationally and holds multiple prestigious accreditations, positioning itself as a top choice for families seeking world-class international education. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and strong branding. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and integrates analytics via Google Tag Manager, though some security headers and privacy compliance features are missing. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but improvements in privacy policy visibility and cookie consent are recommended. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, but the website's content and accreditations support its legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well for content quality, business credibility, and security, with room for enhancement in privacy compliance and explicit security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oberoi-is.org

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates in the education sector, targeting families in Mumbai and internationally who seek IB education. Its business model is focused on premium private schooling with a strong emphasis on academic excellence, leadership, and global citizenship. The school benefits from a large student body, multiple campuses, and a well-established reputation. Partnerships with accreditation bodies and technology providers enhance its market position. The website showcases university acceptance data and alumni success, indicating strong outcomes and reinforcing its competitive advantage. The absence of direct business registration data online is mitigated by the school's visible accreditations and transparent contact information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Juicer.io is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is a notable gap given GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oberoi International School
Description
Oberoi International School is India's leading International Baccalaureate (IB) continuum school located in Mumbai, providing world-class international education with a focus on leadership, academic excellence, and global citizenship.
Key services
IB Primary Years Programme (Nursery - Grade 5), IB Middle Years Programme (Grades 6 - 10), IB Diploma Programme (Grades 11 - 12), Student services including social emotional learning, EAL, SSP, college counselling, Extracurricular activities and community services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, WebFontLoader, Juicer.io (social feed), Finalsite CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with rich content and clear navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available due to malformed request or privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage or footer
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers and physical addresses for two campuses
  5. Multiple accreditations and certifications displayed, enhancing trust
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Finalsite CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including WebFontLoader and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site loads multimedia content such as videos and images optimized for performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, with responsive design and skip-to-content links. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script optimization. The absence of explicit security headers and privacy compliance features represents technical debt. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified but likely managed by Finalsite or a related hosting service.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oberoi-is.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oberoi-is.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.