Skip to main content

Security report for o1vsk.lv

Olaines 1. vidusskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Olaines 1. vidusskola is a Latvian educational institution providing secondary education and related services to students, parents, and the local community. The website serves as an informational portal offering news, school activities, schedules, and contact points. It targets local stakeholders and supports communication through social media channels such as Facebook and Twitter. The business model is that of a public school focused on education and community engagement. Technically, the website uses a custom PHP-based CMS with JavaScript libraries including MooTools and Slimbox for UI effects, and integrates the Facebook SDK for social media features. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring secure communication, but lacks advanced security headers and modern frameworks. Performance and mobile optimization are basic but functional, with a cookie consent mechanism implemented to comply with privacy regulations. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent present. However, it lacks explicit security headers and documented incident response or security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain and content align with a legitimate educational entity. Privacy protection on WHOIS is justified for this type of institution. Overall, the website is trustworthy and serves its informational purpose well, though improvements in security headers, accessibility, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance security and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching o1vsk.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Olaines 1. vidusskola operates as a local educational institution in Latvia, serving a small community with secondary education services. Its market position is stable within the local public education sector, with a focus on quality education, student support, and community involvement. The website supports communication and information dissemination but does not appear to generate revenue directly. The institution leverages social media for outreach and maintains compliance with privacy regulations through cookie consent and a privacy policy. Growth indicators or partnerships are not evident from the website content. The business model is typical for a public school, emphasizing service over profit.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that supports GDPR compliance. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The use of older JavaScript libraries may pose potential vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. No exposed sensitive data or forms collecting personal information were detected, reducing immediate risk. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Consider adding structured data (JSON-LD) to improve SEO and content discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Olaines 1. vidusskola
Description
Olaines 1. vidusskolas mājas lapa providing information about the school, its activities, news, and educational resources.
Key services
Secondary education, Student support, Extracurricular activities, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
MooTools, Slimbox, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian language targeting local community.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; no personal data collection observed.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter is linked.
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented with options for marketing and statistics cookies.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; domain appears legitimate based on content.
  8. No contact phone numbers found; only one email in footer (janis.kalnins@gmail.com) which appears personal, not official.
  9. Logo images are present in header with consistent branding.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph beyond basic og:image found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom PHP-based CMS platform with client-side JavaScript libraries such as MooTools and Slimbox for UI interactions. It integrates the Facebook SDK for social media functionality. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. The HTML structure is valid but lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms like WordPress or Drupal. There is no evidence of advanced SEO techniques or structured data markup. The site could benefit from modernization to improve performance, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with o1vsk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review o1vsk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.