Skip to main content

Security report for nyu.edu

New York University · Education · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.nyu.edu is currently inaccessible due to an AWS WAF CAPTCHA challenge page that requires human verification before access. This security measure blocks automated access and prevents retrieval of the actual website content, including metadata, contact information, and business details. The domain is a well-known educational institution domain for New York University, but WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain restrictions typical for .edu domains. The technical infrastructure includes AWS WAF for bot mitigation, but no further technical or CMS details are accessible. Security posture is limited to the presence of WAF protection, with no visible security headers or policies. Privacy and compliance information are not detectable on the blocked page. Overall, the site is safe with no adult content, but the inability to access content severely limits analysis and lowers the AI scoring.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nyu.edu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nyu.edu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nyu.edu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
49,889
Employees
529
Customers
23,180
Third parties
26,180
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-17 · 535 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nyu.edu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.library.nyu.edu2026-06-17
  • –vital.engineering.nyu.edu2026-06-17
  • –nyu.edu2026-06-15
  • –hroot.abudhabi.nyu.edu2026-06-15
  • –sonic.cs.nyu.edu2026-06-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

New York University is a leading private research university in the United States, serving students, faculty, and researchers. The business model focuses on higher education and research services. The domain is enterprise scale and well recognized in the education sector. Due to the blocked content, no direct business intelligence such as partnerships, certifications, or contact details could be extracted. The domain's market position is strong, but the website's current security configuration restricts visibility into operational details.

Security posture

The website employs AWS WAF with CAPTCHA challenges to mitigate bots and automated threats, indicating a proactive security approach. However, the lack of visible security headers, privacy policies, and contact information for incident response reduces transparency. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, which is common for .edu domains but limits trust verification. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected due to content blocking. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators cannot be assessed from the available data.

Recommendations

  1. Configure WAF to allow verified security scanners or provide a staging environment for analysis.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies accessible without CAPTCHA.
  3. Add visible security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve security posture.
  4. Provide accessible contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website content is blocked by an AWS WAF CAPTCHA challenge page requiring human verification before access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
New York University
Description
New York University (NYU) is a private research university in New York City, providing higher education and research services.
Key services
Higher education, Research, Academic programs
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, AWS WAF

Security

Observed score
25/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of AWS WAF for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to AWS WAF CAPTCHA challenge.
  2. No metadata, Open Graph, or structured data found due to blocked content.
  3. No contact information, privacy policy, or terms of service detected.
  4. No forms or data collection fields present on the CAPTCHA page.
  5. External scripts are from AWS WAF CAPTCHA domains.
  6. No social media or business emails found in the content.
  7. Website appears to be protected by AWS WAF with CAPTCHA to prevent bots.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to .edu domain restrictions.
  9. Content safety rating is safe with no adult or explicit content.
  10. AI scoring is heavily penalized due to blocked content and lack of data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses AWS WAF for security, including CAPTCHA challenges to prevent automated access. The technical stack includes JavaScript and AWS-hosted scripts for CAPTCHA functionality. No CMS or platform details are visible. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be evaluated due to blocked content. The site likely uses Amazon Web Services for hosting. The current security configuration impacts user experience and limits content accessibility, which could affect SEO and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100 +27Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 45/100High26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nyu.edu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nyu.edu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.