Skip to main content

Security report for nuxt.studio

NuxtLabs · Technology · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nuxt Studio is a specialized SaaS platform offering a Git-based CMS and editing experience tailored for Nuxt Content users. The company, NuxtLabs, founded in 2022 and based in France, targets developers and content editors seeking a streamlined content management solution integrated with GitHub and Google authentication. The platform emphasizes ease of content editing, media management, and publishing workflows, positioning itself as a niche player in the Nuxt ecosystem. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, with integrations for analytics (Plausible) and user support (Crisp chat). However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a significant security concern. Security headers and DNSSEC are also absent, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no privacy or cookie policies detected, though a Terms of Service page is present. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended to strengthen the platform's credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nuxt.studio

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nuxt.studio, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nuxt.studio right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NuxtLabs operates in the technology sector, focusing on content management solutions for Nuxt.js developers. Their business model includes a free tier for solo GitHub users and trial plans for teams, indicating a SaaS subscription approach. The company leverages partnerships with GitHub and Google for authentication and integrates with the official Nuxt Content platform, enhancing its ecosystem presence. The website content is professionally designed and clearly targets developers and editors, with a focus on ease of use and collaboration. The domain age and registration details align well with the company's founding date, supporting legitimacy. The presence of active social media links and external references to partner sites suggests a growing and connected business. However, the absence of direct contact information and privacy policies may limit user confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, resulting in unencrypted HTTP traffic. No security headers such as HSTS, CSP, or X-Frame-Options are detected, increasing exposure to common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no DMARC record to protect against email spoofing. The SPF record is correctly configured for Google mail servers, which is a positive aspect. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further indicates compliance gaps. Incident response and security policy documentation are not found, suggesting limited formal security governance. Immediate remediation to enable HTTPS and implement security headers is critical to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement essential security headers including HSTS, Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure DMARC records to improve domain and email security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  5. Add explicit contact information and security incident response details to improve transparency and user trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Nuxt.js framework with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. It uses Shiki for syntax highlighting and integrates third-party services such as Crisp chat for customer support and Plausible for privacy-focused analytics. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and likely deployed on Vercel, providing scalable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 4.3 seconds and a large page size (~1.6 MB), suggesting optimization opportunities. Accessibility and SEO practices appear good based on meta tags and responsive design. However, the lack of HTTPS and security headers introduces technical risks that could impact user trust and data security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nuxt.studio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nuxt.studio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.