Skip to main content

Security report for noranet.io

Noranet · Technology · Estonia

Partial score · DNS & email only

56/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Noranet is a small Estonian-based company specializing in Internet of Things (IoT) solutions for both enterprises and private individuals. Their offerings range from smart monitoring and consumption management in residential buildings to digitalization and automation of industrial processes. The company appears to be recently founded in 2023 and operates under the parent company Startup Solutions OÜ. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with the Kadence theme and includes modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Technically, the website demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with proper SEO meta tags and structured data. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security best practices, as no advanced security headers or DNSSEC are implemented. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, showing consistency and legitimacy. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections enabled, but lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Analytics usage is moderate, relying on Google Tag Manager, which may track user behavior without explicit user consent. Overall, Noranet presents a credible and professional business presence with a solid technical foundation but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching noranet.io

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Noranet targets a niche market in IoT solutions across multiple sectors including real estate, manufacturing, energy, transportation, education, healthcare, retail, media, and telecommunications. Their business model focuses on providing tailored IoT and digitalization services to both corporate and private clients. The company is positioned as a specialized provider with a focus on smart building monitoring and industrial process automation. The recent domain registration and parent company affiliation suggest a startup or early-stage company with growth potential. The website content and structured data indicate a clear branding strategy and sector diversification, which may provide competitive advantages. However, the lack of visible trust signals such as certifications or client testimonials limits the perceived market maturity. The company appears to be building its partnership ecosystem and digital presence steadily.

Security posture

The current security posture of Noranet's website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration protections are in place, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information are published, which may hinder effective incident management and transparency. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces potential privacy risks if not properly configured with consent mechanisms. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the analyzed content. To improve security maturity, the company should implement recommended security headers, enable DNSSEC, publish security and privacy policies, and establish clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add a dedicated security or incident response page with contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Vertelson Consulting OU
Registration number
Startup Solutions OÜ Reg nr (partial, not fully extracted)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Noranet
Description
Noranet IoT lahendused alates kortermajade targast seirest ja tarbimise juhtimisest kuni tööstuse tööprotsesside digitaliseerimise ja automatiseerimiseni.
Key services
IoT solutions for residential buildings, Consumption management, Digitalization and automation of industrial processes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Kadence Theme, WordPress, Kadence Blocks, Kadence Galleries, Kadence Simple Share, Photoswipe
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Auto-renew enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based IoT solutions provider site targeting Estonian and international clients
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page or metadata
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content
  4. No security or incident response contact information published
  5. Use of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of analytics and marketing tracking
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  7. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business claims
  8. No WAF or blocking detected, site content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Kadence theme and several Kadence plugins, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some technical security configurations. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization in security and privacy features to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with noranet.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review noranet.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.