Skip to main content

Security report for noe.sh

Private by Design, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website noe.sh is a personal and creative project launched in early 2024 by Private by Design, LLC, a US-based entity. It features a unique chat-like interface with references to 'doll' and 'owner' interactions and links to various creative and technical projects such as dollcode transcoder, shader art, and Planetside 2 population stats. The site targets a general audience interested in niche technology and creative coding projects. The business model and market position are not clearly defined, indicating a small-scale or hobbyist operation. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is minimal, and no analytics or advertising tools are detected, indicating limited data collection and tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are present, which could be improved. There are no visible privacy, cookie, or incident response policies, and no contact information is provided, limiting compliance and trust signals. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or explicit content, but it lacks professional business and security practices. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the site's nature. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact information would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching noe.sh

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Noe.sh operates as a small-scale, creative technology project with a focus on niche coding and artistic endeavors. Its market positioning is informal and community-oriented rather than commercial. The business model appears to be personal or hobbyist, with no clear revenue streams or commercial services. The target audience includes technology enthusiasts and creative coders. The site links to various partner and related projects, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators and formal partnerships are not evident, suggesting limited commercial ambitions.

Security posture

The security posture of noe.sh is basic but functional. HTTPS is enabled, and domain registration includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses, which protect against domain hijacking. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The site does not appear to collect sensitive user data, reducing risk exposure. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal project but would benefit from enhancements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add contact information and a dedicated security or abuse email address to facilitate incident response and vulnerability reporting.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user engagement and improve the site.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Description
The website appears to be a personal or creative project with a chat-like interface referencing 'doll' and 'owner' interactions, links to various creative and technical projects, and social media profiles. It does not present a traditional business description.
Key services
dollcode transcoder, shader art, planetside 2 population stats, plural system information, pronouns information
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal/creative project with chat-like UI and links to various related creative and technical projects.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. No security or incident response policies visible.
  5. No analytics or advertising detected.
  6. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  7. Technical implementation is basic with no modern frameworks detected.
  8. Domain registration is recent but consistent and legitimate.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. It uses a custom font loaded from fonts.bunny.net and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, which likely provides CDN and DDoS protection. The site design is minimalistic with a chat-like interface and multiple external links to related projects and social media profiles. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO and accessibility features are minimal, and no analytics or tracking scripts are present. The technical stack is simple and low risk but could be modernized with improved SEO, accessibility, and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with noe.sh. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review noe.sh.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.