Skip to main content

Security report for nodeeps.de

nodeeps · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nodeeps is a German-based small web hosting and domain registration provider with over 11 years of experience serving private users and small to medium businesses. Their offerings include webhosting packages with SSL, managed servers, reseller hosting, and domain services. The website is built on Contao CMS and uses modern technologies such as PHP 7.x, MariaDB, and PostgreSQL. The site is accessible, professionally designed, and provides clear navigation and service descriptions. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure mail protocols, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, though WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC policies. The website is safe, trustworthy, and suitable for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nodeeps.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nodeeps.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nodeeps.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nodeeps operates in the technology sector as a niche hosting provider focusing on German-speaking customers. Their competitive advantage lies in long-term market presence, comprehensive hosting packages including SSL certificates, and managed server services with 24/7 monitoring. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue from hosting subscriptions and domain registrations. The company maintains a partner program to expand reach. Growth indicators include recent website redesign and tariff updates. The absence of social media and limited marketing tools suggests a focus on direct customer relationships and organic growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure mail protocols. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could hinder timely security communication. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by adopting best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with EU cookie laws and improve privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Create a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
nodeeps
Description
Nodeeps is an Internet Service Provider offering webhosting, managed servers, reseller servers, and domain registration services primarily for private users and small to medium-sized businesses.
Key services
Webhosting, Managed Server, Domain Registration, Reseller Hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP 7.2, PHP 7.3, PostgreSQL, MySQL5, MariaDB, Perl, ImageMagick, SSH, Cronjobs
Frameworks
Contao Open Source CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (base href uses https)
  • SSL certificates included in hosting packages
  • Secure mail protocols (POP3/IMAP with SSL)
  • SSH access provided

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targets German-speaking customers.
  3. No email addresses or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage; contact likely via contact page.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. Forms use POST method with CSRF token for domain search.
  6. No tracking or analytics scripts detected.
  7. No explicit cookie consent mechanism present.
  8. Website uses Contao CMS and standard web technologies.
  9. SSL is enforced as base href is HTTPS.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Contao Open Source CMS with PHP 7.2/7.3 and supports multiple database backends including MariaDB and PostgreSQL. The infrastructure supports SSH access, cronjobs, and secure mail protocols. The site is served over HTTPS with a base href set accordingly. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization scripts detected. The site is basic mobile optimized and accessible but could benefit from enhancements. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal technical overhead and privacy-friendly design. The DNS is managed internally with dedicated nameservers. Overall, the technical stack is stable and suitable for a small hosting provider but could be modernized further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nodeeps.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nodeeps.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.