Skip to main content

Security report for nobel-education.com

Coursebox Pty Ltd. · Education · Australia

Partial score · DNS & email only

46/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Coursebox Pty Ltd. operates an AI-powered training platform designed to streamline and enhance the creation and delivery of online courses. The platform offers a suite of AI-driven tools including course creation, video generation, assessment, grading, and chatbot tutoring, targeting a broad audience of training providers, educational institutions, and creators. Positioned as a leading AI training platform, Coursebox emphasizes automation, engagement, and integration capabilities to support scalable e-learning businesses. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizes Cloudflare CDN, and integrates multiple third-party services such as Chargebee for payments and Chatbase for chatbot functionality. Despite a professional design and rich content, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, which critically undermines its security posture. Security headers are partially implemented, but the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols poses significant risks. Privacy compliance is moderate, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Business credibility is supported by consistent branding, customer testimonials, and partner logos, though direct contact details are limited to forms and social media links. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business and technical maturity but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nobel-education.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
46

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Coursebox targets the education and training sector with a SaaS business model offering AI-powered course authoring and LMS solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in automating complex training tasks such as video production, assessment grading, and learner support via AI chatbots. Revenue streams include subscription plans and course sales. The platform integrates with existing LMS systems and supports competency standards, appealing to a wide range of training providers including healthcare, agriculture, sales, and corporate onboarding sectors. The company leverages partnerships with payment processors and affiliate marketing platforms to expand reach. Growth indicators include a recent domain registration aligned with company founding in 2024 and a user base of over 70,000 training providers. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security and privacy compliance to strengthen market trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is currently low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. While some security headers like HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options are present, they are insufficient without proper TLS configuration. No evidence of incident response policies or security certifications was found. The site collects user data via forms and tracks users with multiple analytics and marketing scripts but lacks a cookie consent mechanism, raising GDPR compliance concerns. The security culture appears nascent, with room for improvement in vulnerability management and data protection practices. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and implementation of comprehensive privacy controls are critical to mitigate risks and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and OCSP stapling for improved security and performance.
  4. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted behind Cloudflare CDN, leveraging modern front-end technologies including jQuery and various third-party integrations for payments (Chargebee), chatbot services (Chatbase), affiliate marketing (FirstPromoter), and analytics (Google Analytics, Nocodelytics). The site demonstrates good SEO practices with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. However, performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating potential issues with load time measurement or optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. The lack of SSL/TLS is a critical technical debt that impacts security and user trust. Opportunities exist to improve performance monitoring, accessibility compliance, and security hardening to support scalable and secure operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nobel-education.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nobel-education.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.