Skip to main content

Security report for nmugroup.com

Nordisk Media Utveckling AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nordisk Media Utveckling AB operates the NMU Group website as a trusted Nordic domain registrar and IT service provider specializing in domain name registration, DNS management, hosting, IT security, and domain legal services. Established since 1999, the company positions itself as a proactive domain agency with a strong focus on security and personalized service, targeting businesses and organizations requiring comprehensive domain and digital brand management solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with detailed service offerings and customer testimonials, reinforcing its market credibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, and performance optimizations such as lazy loading and caching plugins. It employs Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC services promoted, although the absence of explicit security headers and a vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. However, the website content and business information are consistent and professional, mitigating immediate trust issues. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear contact information and support channels available. Overall, NMU Group presents a reliable and secure digital presence for domain and IT services in the Nordic region, with recommendations to enhance security headers, publish vulnerability disclosure information, and verify domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nmugroup.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NMU Group holds a strong position as an accredited registrar for multiple Nordic ccTLDs and the .eu domain, serving a niche market of domain management and IT security services. Their business model focuses on providing end-to-end domain lifecycle management, DNS services, hosting, monitoring, and legal support, targeting corporate clients with complex domain portfolios. The company leverages its technical expertise and in-house infrastructure to differentiate itself from competitors, emphasizing security and personalized service. The presence of customer testimonials and partnerships with legal firms enhances credibility. Growth potential lies in expanding monitoring and security offerings, as well as deepening integration with clients' digital brand strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and promotion of advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and DMARC. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates compliance with privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file suggest gaps in transparency and defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response contact is available via an abuse page and support emails. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting additional security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly to maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nordisk Media Utveckling AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nordisk Media Utveckling AB
Description
Trygg helhetsleverantör av domännamn sedan 1999. En domännamnspartner med fokus på säkerhet och personlig service. Vi är nordisk media utveckling.
Key services
Domain registration and management, DNS services including DNSSEC and Anycast, Hosting and email services, Monitoring and domain name monitoring, Domain legal services, IT security services including DMARC, SSL/TLS, two-factor authentication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, Autoptimize, LazySizes (lazy loading images)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of DNSSEC mentioned
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on domain name services and IT security
  3. Multiple service categories clearly presented
  4. Professional contact and support information available
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. Good GDPR and cookie compliance
  7. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust slightly
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. Performance optimizations include lazy loading of images via LazySizes, caching, and minification through WP Rocket and Autoptimize plugins. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management. The site is mobile optimized with a clear navigation structure and SEO best practices implemented via Yoast SEO. No hosting provider details were explicitly found. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, contributing to fast load times and good user experience. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High26 findingsView report
  2. 49/100High27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nmugroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nmugroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.