Skip to main content

Security report for nikon.no

Nikon · Technology · Norway

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nikon Norway's official website serves as a localized portal for Nikon's photography products, firmware updates, and promotional campaigns. The site targets photography enthusiasts and professionals in Norway, offering a range of cameras, lenses, and educational content. The website reflects Nikon's strong global brand presence with consistent branding and professional design. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including React, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers are not detected. Privacy compliance is partially implemented with a cookie consent banner but lacks visible privacy policy and terms of service pages. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the site’s professional presentation and brand consistency mitigate concerns. Overall, the site is well-structured, secure, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nikon.no

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nikon.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nikon.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate nikon.no and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
16
Registered
16
Resolving
16
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • ni•••.noMediumhomoglyph
  • ni•••.noMediumbitsquatting
  • li•••.noMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of nikon.no with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nikon Norway operates as a regional extension of Nikon Corporation, focusing on product sales and brand engagement within the Norwegian market. The business model centers on direct product promotion and customer engagement through firmware updates and photography competitions. The site’s integration with multiple country-specific Nikon domains suggests a broad partnership ecosystem. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies on the analyzed page indicates potential areas for improvement in customer transparency and regulatory compliance. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools reflects a data-driven approach to customer insights and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and the use of reputable third-party services for analytics and cookie consent. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks visible incident response or security policy information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a commercial website but could benefit from additional security best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance regulatory compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve customer service and trust.
  4. Publish incident response and security policy information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nikon
Description
Nikon official website for Norway, offering cameras, lenses, firmware updates, and photography competitions.
Key services
Camera and lens sales, Firmware updates, Photography competitions, Customer support and education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Swiper.js (carousel), Roboto font
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  3. Site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking tools.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the analyzed content.
  7. Site content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It uses Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics and monitoring, showing a robust approach to performance and user behavior tracking. The presence of OneTrust for cookie consent reflects attention to privacy compliance. The site uses responsive design and modern CSS, providing good mobile optimization. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate with optimized images and lazy loading. Accessibility is basic, with some skip links but no detailed ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the snippet. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but minimal descriptive content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved with enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nikon.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nikon.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.